Difference between revisions of "User talk:Bigalid"
(→hello: new section) |
|||
| Line 7: | Line 7: | ||
I'm not a spambot but am interested in cameras (esp 1960-90 non autofocus compacts) | I'm not a spambot but am interested in cameras (esp 1960-90 non autofocus compacts) | ||
| + | |||
| + | hello, great to see more additions! | ||
| + | |||
| + | Looking through your LCA additions.. just wondering if you think it's wiser to include specs for Lomography's LC-A+ products on [[LOMO LC-A]] product page? I think it may make more sense with it put on [[Lomography LOMO LC-A+]]. Also with the original having a direct link to the Lomography version. From handling, both products are different even though they look the same, as the original is more of a cheap well built camera, while the lomography plus version more like a cheaply built camera. That why I made it as a separate page, but maybe separate pages are too confusing? Maybe we should not treat them as separate products? I dunno. | ||
| + | --[[User:Tkmedia|Tkmedia]] ([[User talk:Tkmedia|talk]]) 18:45, 27 December 2013 (PST) | ||
Revision as of 02:45, 28 December 2013
Welcome to Camera-Wiki.org!
Thanks for creating an account here on Camera-Wiki.org! We appreciate your willingness to help us create the most comprehensive camera and photography encyclopedia on the web. Camera-Wiki.org is a big website, so we'd like to offer a few quick pointers to help get you started.
You also have a profile page that you can edit to tell us more about yourself if you'd like. It's purely optional but it's always nice to get to know another camera lover.
This website uses software called Mediawiki that's also used by WikiPedia. If you already know how to use and edit WikiPedia, you'll feel right at home here. If not, we have special page where you can learn to edit, called the Sandbox. It's a place where you try things out and experiment with no worries of breaking anything.
Where to find answers:
- Help pages (this is the best place to start learning!)
- FAQ page
Where to ask questions:
How you can help:
- Start improving or adding articles!
- Check our ToDo list for something you'd like to do
- Post photos of your camera gear on Flickr and add them to the Camera-Wiki.org Flickr group
- Make a donation to help us pay for hosting
Botscura (talk) 13:01, 11 December 2013 (PST)
hello
Hi
I'm not a spambot but am interested in cameras (esp 1960-90 non autofocus compacts)
hello, great to see more additions!
Looking through your LCA additions.. just wondering if you think it's wiser to include specs for Lomography's LC-A+ products on LOMO LC-A product page? I think it may make more sense with it put on Lomography LOMO LC-A+. Also with the original having a direct link to the Lomography version. From handling, both products are different even though they look the same, as the original is more of a cheap well built camera, while the lomography plus version more like a cheaply built camera. That why I made it as a separate page, but maybe separate pages are too confusing? Maybe we should not treat them as separate products? I dunno. --Tkmedia (talk) 18:45, 27 December 2013 (PST)
