Difference between revisions of "Camera-wiki.org:Todo list"

From Camera-wiki.org
Jump to: navigation, search
((IMHO (U.kulick) ) Missing articles)
m (Missing articles)
Line 35: Line 35:
 
* [[Le Daguerreotype]] , the first famous series of cameras,designed by Daguerre and made by [[Alphonse Giroux]]. A simple camera, but its description needs a native English writing author
 
* [[Le Daguerreotype]] , the first famous series of cameras,designed by Daguerre and made by [[Alphonse Giroux]]. A simple camera, but its description needs a native English writing author
 
* [[Louis Jacques Mandé Daguerre]] as well as [[William Henry Fox Talbot]]
 
* [[Louis Jacques Mandé Daguerre]] as well as [[William Henry Fox Talbot]]
* [[Voigtländer Bergheil]] link shows image but no article on that wonderful versatile old amateur camera, evalued high by ebayers! (where are the Voigtländer fans? images available on Flickr!)
 
  
 
== Unsatisfactory [[Special:Popularpages|popular pages]] ==
 
== Unsatisfactory [[Special:Popularpages|popular pages]] ==

Revision as of 21:30, 15 November 2006

Feel free to add whatever task you think should have priority.

Image checking

All the images in the site should be hosted in Flickr's Camerapedia pool and have a link that takes back to the corresponding Flickr page. There are some exceptions when a website owner explicitly permits the direct linking of images from his or her page. This does not mean that this practice is encouraged, but it is legitimate.

List of pages with images that are not in Flickr's Camerapedia pool but legitimately display in Camerapedia:

List of pages containing images whose display in Camerapedia is probably not allowed (all these images are commented out: placed within <!-- and -->):

Any other image that does not link back to Flickr's Camerapedia pool is suspect. If you find such an image, you are invited to delete it if no explanation is given in the talk page. (When deleting, please make relevant text edits, looking for such phrases as "As shown in the photo above".)

Image mining

Why linking to other sites? Much more fun it is to view through our Camerapedia pool on Flickr. Several of the now 700 images are still unused in articles.

Good pages

These pages are already good but would be yet better with some work. They will enhance Camerapedia's image.

Missing articles

These articles are IMHO (U.kulick) missing:

Unsatisfactory popular pages

These pages are unsatisfactory but attract many hits, as you can see in the list of popular pages. They will harm Camerapedia's image.

Page Number of views Current version
Canon 17,600 the company history stops around the 1940s
Nikon 14,800 sketchy history
Hasselblad 12,600 no history at all, should be split into separate pages
Rollei 11,400 a chronology but no textual history
Pentax 11,000 the company history stops around 1960
Canon EOS 20D 10,100 no description, links only, many of them are self-promotional
Konica 8,900 two lines for the company history, the list of lenses would be better in separate pages
Contax 8,100 the history of the Japanese Contax is sketchy
Zeiss Ikon 8,000 sketchy company history, incomplete list of models
Leica 7,800 a chronology but no textual history, most articles about Leica cameras are stubs
Voigtländer 7,700 a chronology but no textual history
39mm screw lenses 6,500 should be reorganized and maybe split into more separate pages
Kodak 6,100 sketchy company history, incomplete list of models
Nikon D70 6,100 no description, links only, many of them are self-promotional
Canon EOS 300D 6,000 almost no description, links only, many of them are self-promotional
42mm screw lenses 5,500 should be reorganized and maybe split into more separate pages
Agfa 5,300 brief history, incomplete list of models
Pentacon 5,200 sketchy company history
Rolleiflex 4,300 only contains a list of models
Canon EOS 350D 4,200 minimal description, confusing model names