Difference between revisions of "Camera-wiki.org:Todo list"
(→Unsatisfactory popular pages) |
Rebollo fr (talk | contribs) (→Unsatisfactory popular pages: update) |
||
| Line 33: | Line 33: | ||
! Page !! Number of views !! Current version | ! Page !! Number of views !! Current version | ||
|- | |- | ||
| − | | [[Canon]] || | + | | [[Canon]] || 17,600 || the company history stops around the 1940s |
|- | |- | ||
| − | | [[Nikon]] || | + | | [[Nikon]] || 14,800 || sketchy history |
|- | |- | ||
| − | | [[Hasselblad]] || | + | | [[Hasselblad]] || 12,600 || no history at all, should be split into separate pages |
|- | |- | ||
| − | | [[Rollei]] || | + | | [[Rollei]] || 11,400 || a chronology but no textual history |
|- | |- | ||
| − | | [[Pentax]] || | + | | [[Pentax]] || 11,000 || the company history stops around 1960 |
|- | |- | ||
| − | | [[Canon EOS 20D]] || | + | | [[Canon EOS 20D]] || 10,100 || no description, links only, many of them are self-promotional |
|- | |- | ||
| − | | [[Konica]] || | + | | [[Konica]] || 8,900 || two lines for the company history, the list of lenses would be better in separate pages |
|- | |- | ||
| − | | [[Contax]] || | + | | [[Contax]] || 8,100 || the history of the Japanese Contax is sketchy |
|- | |- | ||
| − | | [[Zeiss Ikon]] || | + | | [[Zeiss Ikon]] || 8,000 || sketchy company history, incomplete list of models |
|- | |- | ||
| − | | [[Leica]] || 7, | + | | [[Leica]] || 7,800 || a chronology but no textual history, most articles about Leica cameras are stubs |
|- | |- | ||
| − | | [[Voigtländer]] || | + | | [[Voigtländer]] || 7,700 || a chronology but no textual history |
|- | |- | ||
| − | | [[ | + | | [[39mm screw lenses]] || 6,500 || should be reorganized and maybe split into more separate pages |
|- | |- | ||
| − | | [[ | + | | [[Kodak]] || 6,100 || sketchy company history, incomplete list of models |
|- | |- | ||
| − | | [[ | + | | [[Nikon D70]] || 6,100 || no description, links only, many of them are self-promotional |
|- | |- | ||
| − | | [[ | + | | [[Canon EOS 300D]] || 6,000 || almost no description, links only, many of them are self-promotional |
|- | |- | ||
| − | | [[42mm screw lenses]] || | + | | [[42mm screw lenses]] || 5,500 || should be reorganized and maybe split into more separate pages |
|- | |- | ||
| − | | [[Agfa]] || | + | | [[Agfa]] || 5,300 || brief history, incomplete list of models |
|- | |- | ||
| − | | [[Pentacon]] || | + | | [[Pentacon]] || 5,200 || sketchy company history |
|- | |- | ||
| [[Rolleiflex]] || 4,300 || only contains a list of models | | [[Rolleiflex]] || 4,300 || only contains a list of models | ||
Revision as of 21:23, 14 June 2006
Feel free to add whatever task you think should have priority.
Image checking
All the images in the site should be hosted in Flickr's Camerapedia pool and have a link that takes back to the corresponding Flickr page. There are some exceptions when a website owner explicitly permits the direct linking of images from his or her page. This does not mean that this practice is encouraged, but it is legitimate.
List of pages with images that are not in Flickr's Camerapedia pool but legitimately display in Camerapedia:
- Riley (confirmed)
- Yashica Electro GX (likely, under investigation)
- Polaroid 600/600 SE (likely, under investigation)
- Fujipet (likely, under investigation)
- Fujica ST-605 (likely, under investigation)
- Kodak S100 (likely, under investigation)
List of pages containing images whose display in Camerapedia is probably not allowed (all these images are commented out: placed within <!-- and -->):
Any other image that does not link back to Flickr's Camerapedia pool is suspect. If you find such an image, you are invited to delete it if no explanation is given in the talk page. (When deleting, please make relevant text edits, looking for such phrases as "As shown in the photo above".)
Good pages
These pages are already good but would be yet better with some work. They will enhance Camerapedia's image.
- Olympus folders, work in progress
Unsatisfactory popular pages
These pages are unsatisfactory but attract many hits, as you can see in the list of popular pages. They will harm Camerapedia's image.
Page Number of views Current version Canon 17,600 the company history stops around the 1940s Nikon 14,800 sketchy history Hasselblad 12,600 no history at all, should be split into separate pages Rollei 11,400 a chronology but no textual history Pentax 11,000 the company history stops around 1960 Canon EOS 20D 10,100 no description, links only, many of them are self-promotional Konica 8,900 two lines for the company history, the list of lenses would be better in separate pages Contax 8,100 the history of the Japanese Contax is sketchy Zeiss Ikon 8,000 sketchy company history, incomplete list of models Leica 7,800 a chronology but no textual history, most articles about Leica cameras are stubs Voigtländer 7,700 a chronology but no textual history 39mm screw lenses 6,500 should be reorganized and maybe split into more separate pages Kodak 6,100 sketchy company history, incomplete list of models Nikon D70 6,100 no description, links only, many of them are self-promotional Canon EOS 300D 6,000 almost no description, links only, many of them are self-promotional 42mm screw lenses 5,500 should be reorganized and maybe split into more separate pages Agfa 5,300 brief history, incomplete list of models Pentacon 5,200 sketchy company history Rolleiflex 4,300 only contains a list of models Canon EOS 350D 4,200 minimal description, confusing model names
