Difference between revisions of "Camera-wiki.org:Todo list"
Rebollo fr (talk | contribs) (→Image checking: more pages found) |
(→Image checking: tweaks) |
||
| Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
__TOC__ | __TOC__ | ||
== Image checking == | == Image checking == | ||
| − | All the images in the site should be hosted in [[Flickr]]'s Camerapedia pool and have a link that takes back to the corresponding Flickr page. There are some exceptions when a website owner | + | All the images in the site should be hosted in [[Flickr]]'s Camerapedia pool and have a link that takes back to the corresponding Flickr page. There are some exceptions when a website owner explicitly permits the direct linking of images from his or her page. This does not mean that this practice is encouraged, but it is legitimate. |
List of pages with images that are not in Flickr's Camerapedia pool but legitimately display in Camerapedia: | List of pages with images that are not in Flickr's Camerapedia pool but legitimately display in Camerapedia: | ||
| Line 13: | Line 13: | ||
* [[Kodak S100]] (likely, under investigation) | * [[Kodak S100]] (likely, under investigation) | ||
| − | List of pages containing images | + | List of pages containing images whose display in Camerapedia is probably not allowed (all these images are commented out: placed within '''<!--''' and '''-->'''): |
* [[Yashica Lynx 14E]] | * [[Yashica Lynx 14E]] | ||
* [[GAF]] | * [[GAF]] | ||
| Line 20: | Line 20: | ||
* [[Lensbabies]] | * [[Lensbabies]] | ||
| − | '''Any other image that does not link back to Flickr's Camerapedia pool is suspect'''. If you find such an image, you are invited to '''delete it''' if no explanation is given in the talk page. | + | '''Any other image that does not link back to Flickr's Camerapedia pool is suspect'''. If you find such an image, you are invited to '''delete it''' if no explanation is given in the talk page. (When deleting, please make relevant text edits, looking for such phrases as "As shown in the photo above".) |
== Good pages == | == Good pages == | ||
Revision as of 13:06, 13 June 2006
Feel free to add whatever task you think should have priority.
Image checking
All the images in the site should be hosted in Flickr's Camerapedia pool and have a link that takes back to the corresponding Flickr page. There are some exceptions when a website owner explicitly permits the direct linking of images from his or her page. This does not mean that this practice is encouraged, but it is legitimate.
List of pages with images that are not in Flickr's Camerapedia pool but legitimately display in Camerapedia:
- Riley (confirmed)
- Yashica Electro GX (likely, under investigation)
- Polaroid 600/600 SE (likely, under investigation)
- Fujipet (likely, under investigation)
- Fujica ST-605 (likely, under investigation)
- Kodak S100 (likely, under investigation)
List of pages containing images whose display in Camerapedia is probably not allowed (all these images are commented out: placed within <!-- and -->):
Any other image that does not link back to Flickr's Camerapedia pool is suspect. If you find such an image, you are invited to delete it if no explanation is given in the talk page. (When deleting, please make relevant text edits, looking for such phrases as "As shown in the photo above".)
Good pages
These pages are already good but would be yet better with some work. They will enhance Camerapedia's image.
- Olympus folders, work in progress
Unsatisfactory popular pages
These pages are unsatisfactory but attract many hits, as you can see in the list of popular pages. They will harm Camerapedia's image.
Page Number of views Current version Canon 16,300 the company history stops around the 1940s Nikon 13,600 no history at all Hasselblad 11,400 no history at all, should be split into separate pages Rollei 10,200 a chronology but no textual history Pentax 10,000 the company history stops around 1960 Canon EOS 20D 9,500 no description, links only Konica 7,800 sketchy company history, the list of lenses would be better in separate pages Contax 7,400 a history of the Japanese Contax cameras would be welcome Zeiss Ikon 7,200 sketchy company history, incomplete list of models Leica 7,000 no company history, most articles about Leica cameras are stubs Voigtländer 6,300 a chronology but no textual history, not very relevant Nikon D70 5,800 no description, links only Canon EOS 300D 5,600 no description, links only 39mm screw lenses 5,400 should be reorganized and maybe split into more separate pages Kodak 5,300 sketchy company history, incomplete list of models 42mm screw lenses 4,700 should be reorganized and maybe split into more separate pages Agfa 4,700 no history at all, incomplete list of models Pentacon 4,600 sketchy company history Rolleiflex 4,300 only contains a list of models Canon EOS 350D 4,200 minimal description, confusing model names
