Difference between revisions of "Talk:Ramera"
NihonCamera (talk | contribs) m (agreed and fixed) |
John Kratz (talk | contribs) |
||
| Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
: Hi John, I take your point—although some nuances of word choice are not obvious if English is not a writer's native language. The most authoritative person to describe any camera is the one who has it in their hands—would you like to revise this page? --[[User:Voxphoto|Vox]] 07:20, 29 May 2011 (PDT) | : Hi John, I take your point—although some nuances of word choice are not obvious if English is not a writer's native language. The most authoritative person to describe any camera is the one who has it in their hands—would you like to revise this page? --[[User:Voxphoto|Vox]] 07:20, 29 May 2011 (PDT) | ||
:Agreed and fixed. --[[User:NihonCamera|NihonCamera]] 02:34, 30 May 2011 (PDT) | :Agreed and fixed. --[[User:NihonCamera|NihonCamera]] 02:34, 30 May 2011 (PDT) | ||
| + | ::Thanks, NihonCamera. Vox, I think the page itself is great; it was just the weird adjective I was wondering about. Since I own a Ramera (variant), I guess I'm qualified to say I wouldn't call it "fancy". *grin*<br>The reason I didn't just delete the word is that I wanted to sort of post a reminder to writers to avoid such subjective adjectives. --[[User:John Kratz|John Kratz]] 07:21, 31 May 2011 (PDT) | ||
Latest revision as of 14:21, 31 May 2011
It's a fancy combination of a radio & camera? I do not think "fancy" is an adjective that belongs in a wiki.
- Hi John, I take your point—although some nuances of word choice are not obvious if English is not a writer's native language. The most authoritative person to describe any camera is the one who has it in their hands—would you like to revise this page? --Vox 07:20, 29 May 2011 (PDT)
- Agreed and fixed. --NihonCamera 02:34, 30 May 2011 (PDT)
- Thanks, NihonCamera. Vox, I think the page itself is great; it was just the weird adjective I was wondering about. Since I own a Ramera (variant), I guess I'm qualified to say I wouldn't call it "fancy". *grin*
The reason I didn't just delete the word is that I wanted to sort of post a reminder to writers to avoid such subjective adjectives. --John Kratz 07:21, 31 May 2011 (PDT)
- Thanks, NihonCamera. Vox, I think the page itself is great; it was just the weird adjective I was wondering about. Since I own a Ramera (variant), I guess I'm qualified to say I wouldn't call it "fancy". *grin*
