Difference between revisions of "Talk:Minolta SR-T series"
m (Answer to Footnote syntax) |
|||
| (4 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| − | The bulk of the information in this table came from "The Minolta SRT series" on a website once maintained by Dick Sullivan. The site disappeared somewehere around 2004. It was agreat point of reference. In this page, years of release were added, the rating system he used was scrapped. Some minor rewording.--[[User:Driesvandenelzen1|driesvandenelzen]] 15:54, 10 September 2006 (EDT) | + | == Sullivan's site == |
| + | The bulk of the information in this table came from "The Minolta SRT series" on a website once maintained by Dick Sullivan. The site disappeared somewehere around 2004. It was agreat point of reference. I printed the pages for archival purposes in 2002. In this camerapedia page, years of release were added, the rating system he used was scrapped. Some minor rewording.--[[User:Driesvandenelzen1|driesvandenelzen]] 15:54, 10 September 2006 (EDT) | ||
| + | :There is a record of this site in web.archive.org: here is the [http://web.archive.org/web/20050212200507/http://home.pcisys.net/~rlsnpjs/minolta/srt.html version dated Feb 12, 2005]. --[[User:Rebollo fr|Rebollo fr]] 16:41, 10 September 2006 (EDT) | ||
| + | |||
| + | == Footnote syntax == | ||
| + | |||
| + | I have switched all the footnotes to the <nowiki><ref> </ref></nowiki> syntax. The result is admittedly a bit less beautiful than manually inserted footnotes with '''<sup>1)</sup>''' counters, but it will be much easier to manage if someone wants to add another footnote in the future. --[[User:Rebollo fr|Rebollo fr]] 07:05, 20 January 2007 (EST) | ||
| + | :Thanks for the work. Now that I know the coding scheme, I will use it in future articles. Dennis. | ||
Latest revision as of 22:53, 23 January 2007
Sullivan's site
The bulk of the information in this table came from "The Minolta SRT series" on a website once maintained by Dick Sullivan. The site disappeared somewehere around 2004. It was agreat point of reference. I printed the pages for archival purposes in 2002. In this camerapedia page, years of release were added, the rating system he used was scrapped. Some minor rewording.--driesvandenelzen 15:54, 10 September 2006 (EDT)
- There is a record of this site in web.archive.org: here is the version dated Feb 12, 2005. --Rebollo fr 16:41, 10 September 2006 (EDT)
Footnote syntax
I have switched all the footnotes to the <ref> </ref> syntax. The result is admittedly a bit less beautiful than manually inserted footnotes with 1) counters, but it will be much easier to manage if someone wants to add another footnote in the future. --Rebollo fr 07:05, 20 January 2007 (EST)
- Thanks for the work. Now that I know the coding scheme, I will use it in future articles. Dennis.
