Difference between revisions of "Talk:McKeown's"
(responding to the copyright question) |
m |
||
| Line 6: | Line 6: | ||
--[[User:Dustin McAmera|Dustin McAmera]] 13:06, 14 March 2011 (PDT) | --[[User:Dustin McAmera|Dustin McAmera]] 13:06, 14 March 2011 (PDT) | ||
: While I don't think they would mind the free promotion, I take your point... Just to be on the safe side I substituted a different photo, one which has more original content than just a straight copy of the cover. --[[User:Voxphoto|Vox]] 14:29, 15 March 2011 (PDT) | : While I don't think they would mind the free promotion, I take your point... Just to be on the safe side I substituted a different photo, one which has more original content than just a straight copy of the cover. --[[User:Voxphoto|Vox]] 14:29, 15 March 2011 (PDT) | ||
| + | I agree they would probably like it shown, (perhaps with an Amazon link! Commercial fork, anyone?) but I think your choice is better. --[[User:Dustin McAmera|Dustin McAmera]] 14:49, 15 March 2011 (PDT) | ||
Revision as of 21:49, 15 March 2011
Ross, you may wish to have a look at: Sources:_English_language#McKeown.27s_Guide --Heritagefutures 05:21, 22 February 2011 (PST)
- I was reluctant to start "editorializing" on that page, although now I see the Japanese-camera book section gives a long description of each. I've retained the separate page here as a Glossary entry, but linked to Sources too--Vox 06:13, 22 February 2011 (PST)
- I can see your reluctance... ;-) but I think this annotated bibliography type is very useful for the non-specialist. --Heritagefutures 13:29, 22 February 2011 (PST)
Is it ok to show the cover of the book like that? It's a published work, still in copyright, surely? --Dustin McAmera 13:06, 14 March 2011 (PDT)
- While I don't think they would mind the free promotion, I take your point... Just to be on the safe side I substituted a different photo, one which has more original content than just a straight copy of the cover. --Vox 14:29, 15 March 2011 (PDT)
I agree they would probably like it shown, (perhaps with an Amazon link! Commercial fork, anyone?) but I think your choice is better. --Dustin McAmera 14:49, 15 March 2011 (PDT)
