Difference between revisions of "Talk:Leica R4–R7"
(old R6 article) |
(→Edits: new section) |
||
| Line 6: | Line 6: | ||
See [[Talk:Leica R4–R7/Leica R6 (previous article)]] for the old article on the R4 (whose content I am about to merge), and for its history. -- [[User:Hoarier|Hoarier]] 17:17, 12 January 2012 (PST) | See [[Talk:Leica R4–R7/Leica R6 (previous article)]] for the old article on the R4 (whose content I am about to merge), and for its history. -- [[User:Hoarier|Hoarier]] 17:17, 12 January 2012 (PST) | ||
| + | |||
| + | == Edits == | ||
| + | |||
| + | Hi, it seems you disagreed with some of the edits I made to the prose of this article, and reverted almost all of them. A basic principle of a wiki is that it is a collaborative project. The web offers many opportunities for you to publish your own work if you would prefer not to have others alter and modify what you write. I made some changes to the phrasing not for arbitrary reasons, but because I felt it improved the clarity and flow. Naturally if I introduced factual errors those should be corrected. I hope you can continue to add contributions to the wiki with this understanding.--[[User:Voxphoto|Vox]] 12:22, 27 January 2012 (PST) | ||
Revision as of 20:22, 27 January 2012
Old R4 article
See Talk:Leica R4–R7/Leica R4 (previous article) for the old article on the R4 (whose content I am about to merge), and for its history. -- Hoarier 16:42, 12 January 2012 (PST)
Old R6 article
See Talk:Leica R4–R7/Leica R6 (previous article) for the old article on the R4 (whose content I am about to merge), and for its history. -- Hoarier 17:17, 12 January 2012 (PST)
Edits
Hi, it seems you disagreed with some of the edits I made to the prose of this article, and reverted almost all of them. A basic principle of a wiki is that it is a collaborative project. The web offers many opportunities for you to publish your own work if you would prefer not to have others alter and modify what you write. I made some changes to the phrasing not for arbitrary reasons, but because I felt it improved the clarity and flow. Naturally if I introduced factual errors those should be corrected. I hope you can continue to add contributions to the wiki with this understanding.--Vox 12:22, 27 January 2012 (PST)
