Difference between revisions of "Talk:Konica (I), II and III"

From Camera-wiki.org
Jump to: navigation, search
m
Line 1: Line 1:
 
 
== Featured article material? ==
 
== Featured article material? ==
The only doubtful photo rights in this article are the Konica II one from "Reid at Pardees Camera" and hosted by Rebollo_fr on Flickr. Fortunately there's another Konica II shot from mfphotos that's now available in our new pool. The "billboard" shot on the front page can be one from the article or from [http://www.flickr.com/photos/vox/tags/konica/ my stream] --[[User:Voxphoto|Vox]] 13:57, 3 February 2011 (CST)
+
The only doubtful photo rights in this article are the Konica II details from "Reid at Pardees Camera" and hosted by Rebollo_fr on Flickr. Fortunately there's another Konica II shot from mfphotos that's now available in our new pool. The "billboard" shot on the front page can be one from the article or from [http://www.flickr.com/photos/vox/tags/konica/ my stream] --[[User:Voxphoto|Vox]] 13:57, 3 February 2011 (CST)
  
 
==nice page==
 
==nice page==

Revision as of 19:58, 3 February 2011

Featured article material?

The only doubtful photo rights in this article are the Konica II details from "Reid at Pardees Camera" and hosted by Rebollo_fr on Flickr. Fortunately there's another Konica II shot from mfphotos that's now available in our new pool. The "billboard" shot on the front page can be one from the article or from my stream --Vox 13:57, 3 February 2011 (CST)

nice page

This is a great page, has a lot of useful differentiation on the models. Glad I could contribute. Feel free to add any images from the camerapedia pool that I have contributed. I was lucky enough to recently purchase a very nice Konica I setup. -- Apocaplops 16:18, 25 October 2007 (EDT)

I screwed up.

On this edit: Plops turns out to be entirely right. Sure to find evidence to prove him wrong, I went looking -- and thereupon found that what I'd thought was a separate eyepiece was instead the rewind release button (or similar). Duh! Thank you, Plops! -- Hoary 10:12, 6 September 2007 (EDT)

It seems to me that the advertisement is still under copyright. However I'm not sure: it was published in the US and doesn't have the © notice. I would like to have the opinion of someone better informed. Maybe some people at Wikipedia are experts on these things, we could ask them. --Rebollo fr 15:24, 7 October 2007 (EDT)

Better picture

I replaced the picture of the Konica IIIA by another one, which is much better in my opinion, and is available in a larger size. Feel free to disagree and revert to the previous picture. --Rebollo fr 08:06, 8 January 2009 (EST)