Difference between revisions of "Talk:Argus C3"
John Kratz (talk | contribs) |
John Kratz (talk | contribs) |
||
| Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
John Kratz <br>________________________ | John Kratz <br>________________________ | ||
| − | + | Why was it necessary to remove the text identifying the red C3 as having a custom, non-original covering? Again, I have no problem with the inclusion of the photo, but with nothing identifying it as a non-original color, it misleads viewers of the page into possibly believing the C3 was manufactured in red as well as black. | |
| − | |||
Revision as of 19:51, 30 December 2010
I am unhappy with the new photo at the top of this page. While the camera restoration and the photo of it are nice, a red C3 should not be the representative of this camera model. The C3 was never made in red and having this photo at the top of the page is misleading.
I have no problem with the inclusion of the photo on this page, but I do not think it should be at the top and I think it should certainly be described as a custom-color restoration.
John Kratz
________________________
Why was it necessary to remove the text identifying the red C3 as having a custom, non-original covering? Again, I have no problem with the inclusion of the photo, but with nothing identifying it as a non-original color, it misleads viewers of the page into possibly believing the C3 was manufactured in red as well as black.
