Difference between revisions of "Minolta Dynax 5"
m (one photo is not actually in CW pool; have invited) |
m (fixed coding errors to display img rights) |
||
| Line 5: | Line 5: | ||
| image_text= | | image_text= | ||
| image_by=Uwe Kulick | | image_by=Uwe Kulick | ||
| − | | | + | | image_rights=with permission |
}} | }} | ||
| Line 14: | Line 14: | ||
| image_text= | | image_text= | ||
| image_by= Tony Kemplen | | image_by= Tony Kemplen | ||
| − | | | + | | image_rights=with permission |
}}<br style="clear:left"/> | }}<br style="clear:left"/> | ||
| Line 25: | Line 25: | ||
| image_text= | | image_text= | ||
| image_by=image by chillie 63 | | image_by=image by chillie 63 | ||
| − | | | + | | image_rights= |
}}<br style="clear:left"/> | }}<br style="clear:left"/> | ||
Revision as of 17:15, 20 October 2011
|
| image by Uwe Kulick (Image rights) |
|
| image by Tony Kemplen (Image rights) |
At the start of the millennium Minolta showed for the last time its pride about its autofocus system SLRs with the Alpha-mount. The pride of the company was perfectly represented by another superb camera model of that series, the Minolta Dynax 5. In the class of low-price amateur cameras it got best notes in tests and comparisons. It was a light fast camera which got all the features of the Minolta Dynax 600si, thus being a mighty tool for amateurs.
|
| image by image by chillie 63 |
