Difference between revisions of "Cross processing"

From Camera-wiki.org
Jump to: navigation, search
(minor expansion)
(expanded factual sections; no lomography did not invent)
Line 1: Line 1:
A experimental technique popularized by the [[lomography|Lomographic Society]], where film is processed using a "wrong" process, intended for a different type of film. (2003 ~ present)
+
Cross-processing is an experimental technique where films are developed in the "wrong" chemistry for their emulsion type, giving unexpected shifts in color palette or contrast. Cross-processing may often be seen abbreviated as '''xpro'''.
  
* [http://www.toxpose.com/forums/kb.php?mode=article&k=1 Explanation of Cross Processing, Courtesy of  toxpose.com]
+
==Background==
 +
 
 +
Ordinarily, a film sold for color prints should be processed in [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/C-41_process C-41 chemistry] and a color slide film (typically named ''something''-'''chrome''') should be developed in [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/E-6_process process E-6].
 +
 
 +
But in the structure of their emulsions, slide and print film are essentially similar. Their manufacturers have simply engineered eaches color balance and contrast to best match the standard processing they'll receive. When a color film is put through the "wrong" chemistry, an image still results, just one that is different from what the manufacturer aimed for.
 +
 
 +
While cross processing has happened as an occasional lab mistake throughout the history of color film, some more experimentally-minded photographers began seeking it out for the unusual visual effects produced. More recently, the xpro effect has been widely publicized through the activities of the [[lomography|Lomographic Society]] and users of its cameras. But it is the processing itself, rather than any particular type of camera, which causes the effects.
 +
 
 +
There is often some dispute about whether cross-processing damages the chemistry or calibration of automated processors; many labs refuse to cross-process film, believing that it does. When cross-processed film is a small percentage of the total, its effect is likely to be negligible.
 +
 
 +
The exception is processing movie film or [[Kodachrome]] in the wrong processes. These films are coated with a rem-jet antireflection backing, which can float loose and gunk up a processing machine.
 +
 
 +
==Slide film in C-41==
 +
 
 +
This is by far the most popular form of cross processing. It gives punchy, alien colors and sometimes blasted-looking contrasts. In this process the slide film develops into a negative, although one lacking the typical reddish tint of normal C-41 negatives. Some of the classic "xpro look" may result form automated printing or scanning machines not coping well with the unexpected color balance. When scanning ones own film, the color and contrast are quite manipulable—from nearly normal to extremely wacky.
 +
 
 +
The heightened contrast accentuates any [[vignetting]] present in a camera's lens—an effect that shows up with many [[toy camera]]s, as well as the [[Lomo LC-A]], the [[Olympus XA|Olympus XA2]], and the [[Vivitar Ultra Wide & Slim]]
 +
 
 +
==Print film in E-6==
 +
Much less commonly seen, this leads to a positive transparency with a muted, pastel contrasts. The color balance tends to shift towards pink or yellow.
 +
 
 +
==Color film in B&W chemistry==
 +
 
 +
This form of cross processing does not activate any of the color dyes in the film, and so results in a monochromatic negative. (Scanning this using color settings may yield varying tints across the frame.) Without the use of a color-process bleach step, the negative may have a dense coffee-colored background that is difficult to work with.
 +
 
 +
==Digital emulations==
 +
 
 +
Distorted xpro colors have become such a part of today's visual culture that digital simulations of them are ubiquitous. Xpro effects are a standard setting on many new digital cameras. There are also numerous smartphone apps and image-editor plug-ins that serve the same purpose.
 +
 
 +
==Links==
 +
 
 +
*[http://blog.epicedits.com/2008/10/15/cross-processing-tips-and-suggestions/ Epic Edits: Cross Processing Tips and Suggestions]
 +
*[http://www.flickr.com/groups/crossprocessing/ Flickr Cross-Processing Group]

Revision as of 03:22, 24 February 2011

Cross-processing is an experimental technique where films are developed in the "wrong" chemistry for their emulsion type, giving unexpected shifts in color palette or contrast. Cross-processing may often be seen abbreviated as xpro.

Background

Ordinarily, a film sold for color prints should be processed in C-41 chemistry and a color slide film (typically named something-chrome) should be developed in process E-6.

But in the structure of their emulsions, slide and print film are essentially similar. Their manufacturers have simply engineered eaches color balance and contrast to best match the standard processing they'll receive. When a color film is put through the "wrong" chemistry, an image still results, just one that is different from what the manufacturer aimed for.

While cross processing has happened as an occasional lab mistake throughout the history of color film, some more experimentally-minded photographers began seeking it out for the unusual visual effects produced. More recently, the xpro effect has been widely publicized through the activities of the Lomographic Society and users of its cameras. But it is the processing itself, rather than any particular type of camera, which causes the effects.

There is often some dispute about whether cross-processing damages the chemistry or calibration of automated processors; many labs refuse to cross-process film, believing that it does. When cross-processed film is a small percentage of the total, its effect is likely to be negligible.

The exception is processing movie film or Kodachrome in the wrong processes. These films are coated with a rem-jet antireflection backing, which can float loose and gunk up a processing machine.

Slide film in C-41

This is by far the most popular form of cross processing. It gives punchy, alien colors and sometimes blasted-looking contrasts. In this process the slide film develops into a negative, although one lacking the typical reddish tint of normal C-41 negatives. Some of the classic "xpro look" may result form automated printing or scanning machines not coping well with the unexpected color balance. When scanning ones own film, the color and contrast are quite manipulable—from nearly normal to extremely wacky.

The heightened contrast accentuates any vignetting present in a camera's lens—an effect that shows up with many toy cameras, as well as the Lomo LC-A, the Olympus XA2, and the Vivitar Ultra Wide & Slim

Print film in E-6

Much less commonly seen, this leads to a positive transparency with a muted, pastel contrasts. The color balance tends to shift towards pink or yellow.

Color film in B&W chemistry

This form of cross processing does not activate any of the color dyes in the film, and so results in a monochromatic negative. (Scanning this using color settings may yield varying tints across the frame.) Without the use of a color-process bleach step, the negative may have a dense coffee-colored background that is difficult to work with.

Digital emulations

Distorted xpro colors have become such a part of today's visual culture that digital simulations of them are ubiquitous. Xpro effects are a standard setting on many new digital cameras. There are also numerous smartphone apps and image-editor plug-ins that serve the same purpose.

Links