Difference between revisions of "User talk:Hoarier"
(horribler and horribler) |
|||
| Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
:I'd been thinking of Hoarendous. -- [[User:Hoarier|Hoarier]] 21:06, 14 April 2011 (PDT) | :I'd been thinking of Hoarendous. -- [[User:Hoarier|Hoarier]] 21:06, 14 April 2011 (PDT) | ||
| + | |||
| + | I' sorry, I accidentally wrote into Your User page instead into You discussion page. I don't mind it as "tampering" if You'll move our discussion to this talk page where it should belong to. Sorry, my mistake. I also don't agree that we have a change of policy. The "[[Be bold]]" article comes from my experience with Camerapedia. We cooperated well, and we had a majority of cases were changes were not reverted but respected and further developed by the others. The first mentioning of "be bold" philosophy was by You (when You were "Hoary"). It was necessary to remind the project community of the "be bold" idea since there were discussions on our mailing list going into the direction: Don't change anything, that's dangerous. If your opinion is that nothing should be changed in this wiki we should lock all articles. I wouldn't like that. We can trust each other as we could in the past. In the article [[Be bold]] I wrote nothing else than You: "''Changes for the better are good; those for the worse are bad; it's as simple as that.''" Changes for the better, in my words "improvements". Please read the texts carefully that You criticize. [[User:U. kulick|U. Kulick]] 18:06, 29 April 2011 (PDT) | ||
Revision as of 01:06, 30 April 2011
If your login chokes one more time, will you return as "Hoariest"? (Hrm, something doesn't sound right about that.)--Vox 20:38, 14 April 2011 (PDT)
- I'd been thinking of Hoarendous. -- Hoarier 21:06, 14 April 2011 (PDT)
I' sorry, I accidentally wrote into Your User page instead into You discussion page. I don't mind it as "tampering" if You'll move our discussion to this talk page where it should belong to. Sorry, my mistake. I also don't agree that we have a change of policy. The "Be bold" article comes from my experience with Camerapedia. We cooperated well, and we had a majority of cases were changes were not reverted but respected and further developed by the others. The first mentioning of "be bold" philosophy was by You (when You were "Hoary"). It was necessary to remind the project community of the "be bold" idea since there were discussions on our mailing list going into the direction: Don't change anything, that's dangerous. If your opinion is that nothing should be changed in this wiki we should lock all articles. I wouldn't like that. We can trust each other as we could in the past. In the article Be bold I wrote nothing else than You: "Changes for the better are good; those for the worse are bad; it's as simple as that." Changes for the better, in my words "improvements". Please read the texts carefully that You criticize. U. Kulick 18:06, 29 April 2011 (PDT)
