Difference between revisions of "Trinar"
m (Minor layout adjustment) |
Hanskerensky (talk | contribs) m (Redirected Link URL to new site) |
||
(One intermediate revision by the same user not shown) | |||
Line 7: | Line 7: | ||
|image_rights= (C) | |image_rights= (C) | ||
}} | }} | ||
− | + | The '''Trinar''' was a [[lens]] made by [[Rodenstock]]. The [[anastigmat]]ic lens was made as well for [[camera]]s as for [[enlarger]]s. It was obviously offered for [[camera]]s as [[normal lens]], and despite of its three-element construction it was featured almost like a well-rendering upper-quality lens. Some say it was better than [[Schneider]]'s Radionar.<ref>[https://www.photo.net/forums/topic/86047-rodenstock-trinar-lens-vs-schneider-xenar-or-tessar/ better than Radionar?] Photo.net discussion</ref> Others say it's sharp just in the frame center and maybe better for BW-photography, maybe comparable with [[Zeiss]]' Triotar.<ref>[https://www.photrio.com/forum/threads/rodenstock-trinar.35183/ maybe good enough for black&white] Photo.net discussion</ref> | |
− | The '''Trinar''' was a [[lens]] made by [[Rodenstock]]. The [[anastigmat]]ic lens was made as well for [[camera]]s as for [[enlarger]]s. It was obviously offered for [[camera]]s as [[normal lens]], and despite of its three-element construction it was featured almost like a well-rendering upper-quality lens. Some say it was better than [[Schneider]]'s Radionar.<ref>[ | ||
===enlarger lenses=== | ===enlarger lenses=== |
Latest revision as of 04:34, 15 February 2024
The lens in a fast shutter on a rangefinder camera means that it was featured as a lens with notable quality. image by in2classics (Image rights) |
The Trinar was a lens made by Rodenstock. The anastigmatic lens was made as well for cameras as for enlargers. It was obviously offered for cameras as normal lens, and despite of its three-element construction it was featured almost like a well-rendering upper-quality lens. Some say it was better than Schneider's Radionar.[1] Others say it's sharp just in the frame center and maybe better for BW-photography, maybe comparable with Zeiss' Triotar.[2]
enlarger lenses
- Rodenstock Trinar 1:4,5 f=105mm
- Rodenstock Trinar 1:4,5 f=75mm
- Rodenstock Trinar 1:4,5 f=50mm
- Rodenstock Trinar 1:3,5 f=50mm
cameras with Trinar
*Lily (metal and tropical) | |
*Rifax | |
*Gewirette | |
*Ohca | |
*Idea A | |
*First Roll | |
*First Etui | |
*Beirette | |
*Romax plate folder | |
*Edixa 16 | - Rodenstock Trinar 1:2,8 f=25mm |
*TDC Stereo Colorist | - 2× Rodenstock Trinar 1:3,5 f=35mm |
*Boots Pakmatic | - Rodenstock Trinar 1:2,8 f=38mm |
*Paxette electromatic | - Rodenstock-Trinar L 1:2,8 f=40mm |
*Bilora Bella | - Rodenstock-Trinar 1:2,8 f=45mm |
*Regula L | - Rodenstock-Trinar 1:2,8 f=45mm |
*Durata | - Rodenstock Trinar 1:3.5 f=4.5cm |
*Baldina | - Rodenstock Trinar 1:2.8 f=50mm |
*Metharette | - Rodenstock Trinar-Anastigmat 1:4.5 5cm |
*Ysella | - Rodenstock Trinar 1:2.9 5cm |
*Altiflex | - Rodenstock-Trinar-Anastigmat 1:4.5 f=75mm |
*Ysette | - Rodenstock Trinar 1:2.9 7.5cm |
*Lisette | - Rodenstock-Trinar 1:2.8 f=80mm |
*Metharette | - Rodenstock Trinar-Anastigmat 1:4.5 5cm |
*Rokuoh-Sha Special Pearlette | - Rodenstock Trinar-Anastigmat 1:4.5 4inch |
*Franka Rolfix II/Hapo 5 | - Rodenstock-Trinar 1:3.5 f=105mm |
*Supreme | - Rodenstock Trinar 1:4.5 f=10.5cm |
*Kinka plate folders | - Rodenstock Trinar 1:4.5 f=10.5cm |
*Kokka | - Rodenstock Trinar Anastigmat 1:6.3 f=10.5cm |
*Lotte | - G.Rodenstock Trinar-Anastigmat 1:4.5 f=10.5cm |
*Bettax | - Rodenstock-Trinar-Anastigmat 1:4.5 f=10.5cm |
*large format view cameras | - Rodenstock Trinar-Anastigmat 1:6.3 f=15cm |
Conclusion: The lens was a worldwide success, over four decades. Probaly a few copies were made by Japanese lens makers.
Notes
- ↑ better than Radionar? Photo.net discussion
- ↑ maybe good enough for black&white Photo.net discussion