Difference between revisions of "Trinar"
m (→References: adjusted heading) |
Hanskerensky (talk | contribs) m (Redirected Link URL to new site) |
||
| (3 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown) | |||
| Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
|image_source= http://www.flickr.com/photos/in2classics/12561947393/in/pool-camerawiki | |image_source= http://www.flickr.com/photos/in2classics/12561947393/in/pool-camerawiki | ||
|image= http://farm8.staticflickr.com/7306/12561947393_7f9dc2e8ca.jpg | |image= http://farm8.staticflickr.com/7306/12561947393_7f9dc2e8ca.jpg | ||
| − | |image_align= | + | |image_align= right |
| − | |image_text= The lens in a fast shutter on [[rangefinder camera]] means that it was featured as lens with notable quality. | + | |image_text= The lens in a fast shutter on a [[rangefinder camera]] means that it<br> was featured as a lens with notable quality. |
|image_by= in2classics | |image_by= in2classics | ||
|image_rights= (C) | |image_rights= (C) | ||
| − | + | }} | |
| − | + | The '''Trinar''' was a [[lens]] made by [[Rodenstock]]. The [[anastigmat]]ic lens was made as well for [[camera]]s as for [[enlarger]]s. It was obviously offered for [[camera]]s as [[normal lens]], and despite of its three-element construction it was featured almost like a well-rendering upper-quality lens. Some say it was better than [[Schneider]]'s Radionar.<ref>[https://www.photo.net/forums/topic/86047-rodenstock-trinar-lens-vs-schneider-xenar-or-tessar/ better than Radionar?] Photo.net discussion</ref> Others say it's sharp just in the frame center and maybe better for BW-photography, maybe comparable with [[Zeiss]]' Triotar.<ref>[https://www.photrio.com/forum/threads/rodenstock-trinar.35183/ maybe good enough for black&white] Photo.net discussion</ref> | |
| − | The '''Trinar''' was a [[lens]] made by [[Rodenstock]]. The [[anastigmat]]ic lens was made as well for [[camera]]s as for [[enlarger]]s. It was obviously offered for [[camera]]s as [[normal lens]], and despite of its three-element construction it was featured almost like a well-rendering upper-quality lens. Some say it was better than [[Schneider]]'s Radionar.<ref>[ | ||
===enlarger lenses=== | ===enlarger lenses=== | ||
| Line 84: | Line 83: | ||
Conclusion: The lens was a worldwide success, over four decades. Probaly a few copies were made by Japanese lens makers. | Conclusion: The lens was a worldwide success, over four decades. Probaly a few copies were made by Japanese lens makers. | ||
| − | == | + | ==Notes== |
<REFERENCES/> | <REFERENCES/> | ||
[[Category:German lenses]] | [[Category:German lenses]] | ||
Latest revision as of 04:34, 15 February 2024
|
| The lens in a fast shutter on a rangefinder camera means that it was featured as a lens with notable quality. image by in2classics (Image rights) |
The Trinar was a lens made by Rodenstock. The anastigmatic lens was made as well for cameras as for enlargers. It was obviously offered for cameras as normal lens, and despite of its three-element construction it was featured almost like a well-rendering upper-quality lens. Some say it was better than Schneider's Radionar.[1] Others say it's sharp just in the frame center and maybe better for BW-photography, maybe comparable with Zeiss' Triotar.[2]
enlarger lenses
- Rodenstock Trinar 1:4,5 f=105mm
- Rodenstock Trinar 1:4,5 f=75mm
- Rodenstock Trinar 1:4,5 f=50mm
- Rodenstock Trinar 1:3,5 f=50mm
cameras with Trinar
| *Lily (metal and tropical) | |
| *Rifax | |
| *Gewirette | |
| *Ohca | |
| *Idea A | |
| *First Roll | |
| *First Etui | |
| *Beirette | |
| *Romax plate folder | |
| *Edixa 16 | - Rodenstock Trinar 1:2,8 f=25mm |
| *TDC Stereo Colorist | - 2× Rodenstock Trinar 1:3,5 f=35mm |
| *Boots Pakmatic | - Rodenstock Trinar 1:2,8 f=38mm |
| *Paxette electromatic | - Rodenstock-Trinar L 1:2,8 f=40mm |
| *Bilora Bella | - Rodenstock-Trinar 1:2,8 f=45mm |
| *Regula L | - Rodenstock-Trinar 1:2,8 f=45mm |
| *Durata | - Rodenstock Trinar 1:3.5 f=4.5cm |
| *Baldina | - Rodenstock Trinar 1:2.8 f=50mm |
| *Metharette | - Rodenstock Trinar-Anastigmat 1:4.5 5cm |
| *Ysella | - Rodenstock Trinar 1:2.9 5cm |
| *Altiflex | - Rodenstock-Trinar-Anastigmat 1:4.5 f=75mm |
| *Ysette | - Rodenstock Trinar 1:2.9 7.5cm |
| *Lisette | - Rodenstock-Trinar 1:2.8 f=80mm |
| *Metharette | - Rodenstock Trinar-Anastigmat 1:4.5 5cm |
| *Rokuoh-Sha Special Pearlette | - Rodenstock Trinar-Anastigmat 1:4.5 4inch |
| *Franka Rolfix II/Hapo 5 | - Rodenstock-Trinar 1:3.5 f=105mm |
| *Supreme | - Rodenstock Trinar 1:4.5 f=10.5cm |
| *Kinka plate folders | - Rodenstock Trinar 1:4.5 f=10.5cm |
| *Kokka | - Rodenstock Trinar Anastigmat 1:6.3 f=10.5cm |
| *Lotte | - G.Rodenstock Trinar-Anastigmat 1:4.5 f=10.5cm |
| *Bettax | - Rodenstock-Trinar-Anastigmat 1:4.5 f=10.5cm |
| *large format view cameras | - Rodenstock Trinar-Anastigmat 1:6.3 f=15cm |
Conclusion: The lens was a worldwide success, over four decades. Probaly a few copies were made by Japanese lens makers.
Notes
- ↑ better than Radionar? Photo.net discussion
- ↑ maybe good enough for black&white Photo.net discussion
