Difference between revisions of "Trashcam"
m (Reconfigured images so that they align up better. Plus, added two more to make them even.) |
m |
||
(4 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown) | |||
Line 5: | Line 5: | ||
|image= http://farm5.static.flickr.com/4140/4751502861_1426170cf4.jpg | |image= http://farm5.static.flickr.com/4140/4751502861_1426170cf4.jpg | ||
|image_align= right | |image_align= right | ||
− | |image_text= The ubiquitous [[Time Magazine Camera|Time camera]]<br /> | + | |image_text= The ubiquitous [[Time Magazine Camera|Time camera]]<br />Faux-[[SLR]] styling at minimized cost |
|image_by= Bracket ツ | |image_by= Bracket ツ | ||
|image_rights= with permission | |image_rights= with permission | ||
}} | }} | ||
− | The term '''trashcam''' has sometimes jokingly been applied to simple plastic cameras of extremely low value. These might include promotional giveaways, dollar-store closeouts, or thrift- | + | The term '''trashcam''' has sometimes jokingly been applied to simple plastic cameras of extremely low value. These might include promotional giveaways, dollar-store closeouts, or thrift-shop finds—but also examples of outright deception such as the [["Olympia" camera]]. Trashcams may be branded using unfamiliar made-up names, familiar distributors like [[Vivitar]], or recycled defunct trademarks like [[Argus]], [[Ansco]], and [[Bell & Howell]]. |
+ | |||
+ | In contrast to [[point-and-shoot]]s, trashcams are almost universally [[fixed focus]] and have no (or very limited) control over [[exposure]]. This may yield acceptable photo results at medium distances and typical outdoor illumination, but fails miserably outside those parameters. (A few may offer a pipsqueak flash for indoor photos—again, only giving correct exposure at one middling distance.) There is a continuum between cheap plastic cameras that actually have reasonable optics, such as the [[Ansco Pix Panorama]], and true [[toy cameras]] that are especially prized for their degraded, aberrated imagery. | ||
While trashiness is naturally a subjective and debatable concept, one working definition of a trashcam might be, "any camera whose value at least doubles when loaded with film." | While trashiness is naturally a subjective and debatable concept, one working definition of a trashcam might be, "any camera whose value at least doubles when loaded with film." | ||
− | |||
− | |||
<br clear="all"/> | <br clear="all"/> | ||
Line 41: | Line 41: | ||
|image= http://farm6.static.flickr.com/5211/5497959589_4184fd5ae9_m.jpg | |image= http://farm6.static.flickr.com/5211/5497959589_4184fd5ae9_m.jpg | ||
|image_align= left | |image_align= left | ||
− | |image_text= Aperture settings: Sunny,<br> | + | |image_text= Aperture settings: Sunny,<br>cloudy, cloudier, cloudiest |
|image_by= jill elise | |image_by= jill elise | ||
|image_rights= with permission | |image_rights= with permission | ||
Line 49: | Line 49: | ||
{{br}} | {{br}} | ||
− | |||
{|class=floatleft | {|class=floatleft | ||
+ | | | ||
+ | {{Flickr_image | ||
+ | |image_source= https://www.flickr.com/photos/49656291@N00/27089092103/in/pool-camerawiki | ||
+ | |image= http://farm8.staticflickr.com/7487/27089092103_741764d2af_m_d.jpg | ||
+ | |image_align= left | ||
+ | |image_text= Absence of a brand name<br>may give away trashcam status | ||
+ | |image_by= Kenneth Dwain Harrelson | ||
+ | |image_rights= wp | ||
+ | }} | ||
| | | | ||
{{Flickr_image | {{Flickr_image | ||
Line 57: | Line 65: | ||
|image= http://farm1.static.flickr.com/50/149947754_b8886ab02e_m.jpg | |image= http://farm1.static.flickr.com/50/149947754_b8886ab02e_m.jpg | ||
|image_align= left | |image_align= left | ||
− | |image_text= Garish and | + | |image_text= Garish and unexpected<br>colors are also a plus |
|image_by= Voxphoto | |image_by= Voxphoto | ||
|image_rights= non-commercial | |image_rights= non-commercial | ||
Line 66: | Line 74: | ||
|image= http://farm7.staticflickr.com/6137/5957256716_675f5975cf_m_d.jpg | |image= http://farm7.staticflickr.com/6137/5957256716_675f5975cf_m_d.jpg | ||
|image_align= left | |image_align= left | ||
− | |image_text= Fake panoramic settings are | + | |image_text= Fake panoramic settings are<br>sometimes employed |
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
|image_by= Kenneth Dwain Harrelson | |image_by= Kenneth Dwain Harrelson | ||
|image_rights= wp | |image_rights= wp |
Latest revision as of 13:29, 31 May 2021
The ubiquitous Time camera Faux-SLR styling at minimized cost image by Bracket ツ (Image rights) |
The term trashcam has sometimes jokingly been applied to simple plastic cameras of extremely low value. These might include promotional giveaways, dollar-store closeouts, or thrift-shop finds—but also examples of outright deception such as the "Olympia" camera. Trashcams may be branded using unfamiliar made-up names, familiar distributors like Vivitar, or recycled defunct trademarks like Argus, Ansco, and Bell & Howell.
In contrast to point-and-shoots, trashcams are almost universally fixed focus and have no (or very limited) control over exposure. This may yield acceptable photo results at medium distances and typical outdoor illumination, but fails miserably outside those parameters. (A few may offer a pipsqueak flash for indoor photos—again, only giving correct exposure at one middling distance.) There is a continuum between cheap plastic cameras that actually have reasonable optics, such as the Ansco Pix Panorama, and true toy cameras that are especially prized for their degraded, aberrated imagery.
While trashiness is naturally a subjective and debatable concept, one working definition of a trashcam might be, "any camera whose value at least doubles when loaded with film."
|
|
|
|
|
|