Difference between revisions of "Talk:The Kodak Magazine (US)"
Steevithak (talk | contribs) m (moved Talk:Kodak Magazine to Talk:The Kodak Magazine (US): differentiating US and UK publications) |
Steevithak (talk | contribs) m (note about steps taken to differentiate the two mags) |
||
| Line 4: | Line 4: | ||
I know the British Kodak magazine is aimed at the general public because the competitions have rules such as "not open to employees of Kodak Ltd or their families" and the price on the cover of 2d (two pennies or tuppence) is a clue that it is on general sale>' | I know the British Kodak magazine is aimed at the general public because the competitions have rules such as "not open to employees of Kodak Ltd or their families" and the price on the cover of 2d (two pennies or tuppence) is a clue that it is on general sale>' | ||
--[[User:Heritagefutures|Heritagefutures]] ([[User talk:Heritagefutures|talk]]) 17:08, 6 October 2012 (PDT) | --[[User:Heritagefutures|Heritagefutures]] ([[User talk:Heritagefutures|talk]]) 17:08, 6 October 2012 (PDT) | ||
| + | |||
| + | :Maybe better now. We have two articles, each with (hopefully) the correct photo. There's also a disambiguation page and links to each in the main kodak article. Thanks for noticing the problem! [[User:Steevithak|Steevithak]] ([[User talk:Steevithak|talk]]) 22:59, 6 October 2012 (PDT) | ||
Latest revision as of 05:59, 7 October 2012
I removed the image on the suggestion/request of John-Henry Collinson Colonel Blink on Flickr, because, as he writes:
"Basically the magazine referred to in the Camera-Wiki article is an American publication aimed at Kodak workers. My photograph is of a completely different UK publication aimed at the British general public. It should not be used to illustrate this particular Camera-Wiki article. I know the British Kodak magazine is aimed at the general public because the competitions have rules such as "not open to employees of Kodak Ltd or their families" and the price on the cover of 2d (two pennies or tuppence) is a clue that it is on general sale>' --Heritagefutures (talk) 17:08, 6 October 2012 (PDT)
- Maybe better now. We have two articles, each with (hopefully) the correct photo. There's also a disambiguation page and links to each in the main kodak article. Thanks for noticing the problem! Steevithak (talk) 22:59, 6 October 2012 (PDT)
