Difference between revisions of "Talk:Ramera"
(responding to "fancy") |
NihonCamera (talk | contribs) m (agreed and fixed) |
||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
It's a <i>fancy</I> combination of a radio & camera? I do not think "fancy" is an adjective that belongs in a wiki. | It's a <i>fancy</I> combination of a radio & camera? I do not think "fancy" is an adjective that belongs in a wiki. | ||
: Hi John, I take your point—although some nuances of word choice are not obvious if English is not a writer's native language. The most authoritative person to describe any camera is the one who has it in their hands—would you like to revise this page? --[[User:Voxphoto|Vox]] 07:20, 29 May 2011 (PDT) | : Hi John, I take your point—although some nuances of word choice are not obvious if English is not a writer's native language. The most authoritative person to describe any camera is the one who has it in their hands—would you like to revise this page? --[[User:Voxphoto|Vox]] 07:20, 29 May 2011 (PDT) | ||
+ | :Agreed and fixed. --[[User:NihonCamera|NihonCamera]] 02:34, 30 May 2011 (PDT) |
Revision as of 09:34, 30 May 2011
It's a fancy combination of a radio & camera? I do not think "fancy" is an adjective that belongs in a wiki.
- Hi John, I take your point—although some nuances of word choice are not obvious if English is not a writer's native language. The most authoritative person to describe any camera is the one who has it in their hands—would you like to revise this page? --Vox 07:20, 29 May 2011 (PDT)
- Agreed and fixed. --NihonCamera 02:34, 30 May 2011 (PDT)