Difference between revisions of "Talk:Popular Photography"
(oops!) |
(stub begun for the 1912-1917 Boston mag) |
||
| Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
:That's interesting. If you're able to find out more about it and would care to create an article, it would be most welcome. -- [[User:Hoarier|Hoarier]] 02:49, 17 January 2012 (PST) | :That's interesting. If you're able to find out more about it and would care to create an article, it would be most welcome. -- [[User:Hoarier|Hoarier]] 02:49, 17 January 2012 (PST) | ||
| + | |||
| + | ::Since the Google books link definitely confirms it, I've begun a [[Popular Photography (1912–1917) |new stub here]]. Any further additions are welcome. --[[User:Voxphoto|Vox]] 07:24, 17 January 2012 (PST) | ||
Revision as of 15:24, 17 January 2012
Earlier publication
There is an earlier publication of the same name, with a first edition of 1912, published in Boston; here a link to the Google Books scan of volume 1. Edward Vielmetti 21:34, 16 January 2012 (PST)
- That's interesting. If you're able to find out more about it and would care to create an article, it would be most welcome. -- Hoarier 02:49, 17 January 2012 (PST)
- Since the Google books link definitely confirms it, I've begun a new stub here. Any further additions are welcome. --Vox 07:24, 17 January 2012 (PST)
