Difference between revisions of "Talk:Olympus OM-10/20/30/40"
(Suggestion) |
m (rm brackets to stop wanted page) |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| − | Thanks to [[User:Artysmokes|Artysmokes]] for noticing there is no hyphen in the model names. Shouldn't we change the page title accordingly, to | + | Thanks to [[User:Artysmokes|Artysmokes]] for noticing there is no hyphen in the model names. Shouldn't we change the page title accordingly, to Olympus OM10/20/30/40 ? Same thing for the OM707 and OM101, maybe ? |
--[[User:Rebollo fr|rebollo_fr]] 13:19, 27 April 2010 (EDT) | --[[User:Rebollo fr|rebollo_fr]] 13:19, 27 April 2010 (EDT) | ||
Latest revision as of 01:50, 17 September 2012
Thanks to Artysmokes for noticing there is no hyphen in the model names. Shouldn't we change the page title accordingly, to Olympus OM10/20/30/40 ? Same thing for the OM707 and OM101, maybe ? --rebollo_fr 13:19, 27 April 2010 (EDT)
I'd certainly support such changes (particularly as a redirect will still show the old page on Google). Model names can be so tricky. The OM10 is often seen with a hyphen or a space in the name all over the net, but I think it's best to use what actually appears on the camera body for camerapedia. Let's see what other people think. artysmokes 13:34, 27 April 2010 (EDT)
Are there any objections to changing the OM-20 image to another one in the pool? I think it would be better to have one that shows the top plate/shutter speeds dial better, it shares more in common with the OM-30 but that isn't easy to see with the current picture. Kongzi 13:41, 18 June 2012 (PDT)
