Difference between revisions of "Talk:Minolta X-700"
Mwerneburg (talk | contribs) (→formatting & edits: new section) |
(looks like this is solved) |
||
(4 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown) | |||
Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
Nice work, Zuleika! | Nice work, Zuleika! | ||
+ | :Um, well what's lost with this particular image formatting is that the page no longer is added to the correct image-by categories (for example, [[:Category:Image by Raúl Sá Dantas|here is Raúl's]]). | ||
+ | |||
+ | :Can you wedge the [[Template:Flickr image|Flickr image template]] into that same syntax? --[[User:Voxphoto|Vox]] 16:54, 2 May 2011 (PDT) | ||
+ | ::Well, I added an ugly kludge to get this page added to the two photographers' image-by categories, and have their names link to those categories. But it's too cumbersome to do this manually on every page. --[[User:Voxphoto|Vox]] 21:48, 3 May 2011 (PDT) | ||
+ | |||
+ | :::I'd really rather not wedge it in -- after all, it's a table, where no table should be necessary. This doesn't mean that I dismiss your concerns, but I think that some other solution would be better. Sorry, too sleepy now to think about it, plus I'm very rusty with MediaWiki template syntax. [[User:Zuleika|Zuleika]] 04:07, 4 May 2011 (PDT) | ||
+ | |||
+ | ::::It looks like NihonCamera has updated his [[Template:Image author|image-author template]]. so we can use that to achieve the same end. (Thanks, NihonCamera!) --[[User:Voxphoto|Vox]] 06:28, 4 May 2011 (PDT) |
Latest revision as of 13:28, 4 May 2011
formatting & edits
Nice work, Zuleika!
- Um, well what's lost with this particular image formatting is that the page no longer is added to the correct image-by categories (for example, here is Raúl's).
- Can you wedge the Flickr image template into that same syntax? --Vox 16:54, 2 May 2011 (PDT)
- Well, I added an ugly kludge to get this page added to the two photographers' image-by categories, and have their names link to those categories. But it's too cumbersome to do this manually on every page. --Vox 21:48, 3 May 2011 (PDT)
- I'd really rather not wedge it in -- after all, it's a table, where no table should be necessary. This doesn't mean that I dismiss your concerns, but I think that some other solution would be better. Sorry, too sleepy now to think about it, plus I'm very rusty with MediaWiki template syntax. Zuleika 04:07, 4 May 2011 (PDT)
- It looks like NihonCamera has updated his image-author template. so we can use that to achieve the same end. (Thanks, NihonCamera!) --Vox 06:28, 4 May 2011 (PDT)