Difference between revisions of "Talk:Minolta SR-T 101"
m |
|||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
Hi Uwe Kulick, | Hi Uwe Kulick, | ||
| − | I'm wondering why you put this picture in the article. Together with the image that was already there, it looks rather messy right now. I'm not sure you wanted to leave it this way, but I thought I'd | + | I'm wondering why you put this picture in the article. Together with the image that was already there, it looks rather messy right now. I'm not sure you wanted to leave it this way, but I thought I'd mention it anyhow. --[[User:Driesvandenelzen1|driesvandenelzen]] 16:14, 18 October 2006 (EDT) |
Hi Dries van de Nelzen | Hi Dries van de Nelzen | ||
Revision as of 20:40, 18 October 2006
Hi Uwe Kulick,
I'm wondering why you put this picture in the article. Together with the image that was already there, it looks rather messy right now. I'm not sure you wanted to leave it this way, but I thought I'd mention it anyhow. --driesvandenelzen 16:14, 18 October 2006 (EDT)
Hi Dries van de Nelzen
It looks messy when you switch character size to unreadability in Netscape, otherwise I see no problems with the two images. IE likes them together with all character sizes. I just want to encourage our new image contributor Capt.Kodak .
Best regards, Uwe
