Difference between revisions of "Talk:McKeown's"
(Created page with "Ross, you may wish to have a look at: Sources:_English_language#McKeown.27s_Guide --~~~~") |
Hanskerensky (talk | contribs) (→New Edition!: comment) |
||
(7 intermediate revisions by 4 users not shown) | |||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
Ross, you may wish to have a look at: [[Sources:_English_language#McKeown.27s_Guide]] --[[User:Heritagefutures|Heritagefutures]] 05:21, 22 February 2011 (PST) | Ross, you may wish to have a look at: [[Sources:_English_language#McKeown.27s_Guide]] --[[User:Heritagefutures|Heritagefutures]] 05:21, 22 February 2011 (PST) | ||
+ | : I was reluctant to start "editorializing" on that page, although now I see the Japanese-camera book section gives a long description of each. I've retained the separate page here as a Glossary entry, but linked to Sources too--[[User:Voxphoto|Vox]] 06:13, 22 February 2011 (PST) | ||
+ | ::I can see your reluctance... ;-) but I think this annotated bibliography type is very useful for the non-specialist. --[[User:Heritagefutures|Heritagefutures]] 13:29, 22 February 2011 (PST) | ||
+ | |||
+ | Is it ok to show the cover of the book like that? It's a published work, still in copyright, surely? | ||
+ | --[[User:Dustin McAmera|Dustin McAmera]] 13:06, 14 March 2011 (PDT) | ||
+ | : While I don't think they would mind the free promotion, I take your point... Just to be on the safe side I substituted a different photo, one which has more original content than just a straight copy of the cover. --[[User:Voxphoto|Vox]] 14:29, 15 March 2011 (PDT) | ||
+ | I agree they would probably like it shown, (perhaps with an Amazon link! Commercial fork, anyone?) but I think your choice is better. --[[User:Dustin McAmera|Dustin McAmera]] 14:49, 15 March 2011 (PDT) | ||
+ | |||
+ | == New Edition! == | ||
+ | |||
+ | To be called '''McKeown's Camera Encyclopedia & Price Guide'''. | ||
+ | <br>They are considering two publishing options; printed/bound or online/mobile, and are asking for customers' input on their new website. Please share your opinions! | ||
+ | |||
+ | Here is the link: http://mckcamera.com/ | ||
+ | |||
+ | They hope to publish in 2016. | ||
+ | -------------------------------- | ||
+ | Ah great, that would be nice, a new edition after 10 years ! | ||
+ | [[User:Hanskerensky|Hanskerensky]] ([[User talk:Hanskerensky|talk]]) 13:35, 28 May 2015 (CDT) |
Latest revision as of 18:35, 28 May 2015
Ross, you may wish to have a look at: Sources:_English_language#McKeown.27s_Guide --Heritagefutures 05:21, 22 February 2011 (PST)
- I was reluctant to start "editorializing" on that page, although now I see the Japanese-camera book section gives a long description of each. I've retained the separate page here as a Glossary entry, but linked to Sources too--Vox 06:13, 22 February 2011 (PST)
- I can see your reluctance... ;-) but I think this annotated bibliography type is very useful for the non-specialist. --Heritagefutures 13:29, 22 February 2011 (PST)
Is it ok to show the cover of the book like that? It's a published work, still in copyright, surely? --Dustin McAmera 13:06, 14 March 2011 (PDT)
- While I don't think they would mind the free promotion, I take your point... Just to be on the safe side I substituted a different photo, one which has more original content than just a straight copy of the cover. --Vox 14:29, 15 March 2011 (PDT)
I agree they would probably like it shown, (perhaps with an Amazon link! Commercial fork, anyone?) but I think your choice is better. --Dustin McAmera 14:49, 15 March 2011 (PDT)
New Edition!
To be called McKeown's Camera Encyclopedia & Price Guide.
They are considering two publishing options; printed/bound or online/mobile, and are asking for customers' input on their new website. Please share your opinions!
Here is the link: http://mckcamera.com/
They hope to publish in 2016.
Ah great, that would be nice, a new edition after 10 years ! Hanskerensky (talk) 13:35, 28 May 2015 (CDT)