Difference between revisions of "Talk:Leica M3"
m |
|||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| + | * ''"At the same time, the lack of an internal exposure meter and the lack of wide angle framelines is regretted by most"''. | ||
| + | ** I've read a lot about the Leica M3 and I've seldom if ever read any regrets about the lack of an internal exposure meter. | ||
| − | + | Actually it's even worse, it's incorrect! According to Pacific Rim's website, there was a clip-on exposure meter available for the M3 that could even be coupled to the shutter. | |
| − | + | [[User:Driesvandenelzen1|driesvandenelzen]] 08:00, 29 June 2006 (EDT) | |
| − | * "Many consider the M3 to be the most beautiful Leica ever made" | + | * ''"Many consider the M3 to be the most beautiful Leica ever made"'' |
** What, if anything, does this mean? | ** What, if anything, does this mean? | ||
Revision as of 12:00, 29 June 2006
- "At the same time, the lack of an internal exposure meter and the lack of wide angle framelines is regretted by most".
- I've read a lot about the Leica M3 and I've seldom if ever read any regrets about the lack of an internal exposure meter.
Actually it's even worse, it's incorrect! According to Pacific Rim's website, there was a clip-on exposure meter available for the M3 that could even be coupled to the shutter. driesvandenelzen 08:00, 29 June 2006 (EDT)
- "Many consider the M3 to be the most beautiful Leica ever made"
- What, if anything, does this mean?
