Difference between revisions of "Talk:Konica F"
(recent edits to this are not in "encyclopedic" format and need revision) |
m |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| − | While the information about Ansel Adams perhaps (or perhaps not) owning this camera may be interesting to some, we need to revise this article so it's more "encyclopedic" in format. An ''interesting side note'' or an ''update'' with a signature are not really appropriate—certainly not in text which appears above the table of contents. (Have a look at the format used in other articles and compare.) I would be grateful if the contributor of that material could condense it into something much simpler, perhaps | + | While the information about Ansel Adams perhaps (or perhaps not) owning this camera may be interesting to some, we need to revise this article so it's more "encyclopedic" in format. An ''interesting side note'' or an ''update'' with a signature are not really appropriate—certainly not in text which appears above the table of contents. (Have a look at the format used in other articles and compare.) I would be grateful if the contributor of that material could condense it into something much simpler, perhaps as a footnote. --[[User:Voxphoto|Vox]] 08:13, 29 January 2012 (PST) |
Latest revision as of 16:14, 29 January 2012
While the information about Ansel Adams perhaps (or perhaps not) owning this camera may be interesting to some, we need to revise this article so it's more "encyclopedic" in format. An interesting side note or an update with a signature are not really appropriate—certainly not in text which appears above the table of contents. (Have a look at the format used in other articles and compare.) I would be grateful if the contributor of that material could condense it into something much simpler, perhaps as a footnote. --Vox 08:13, 29 January 2012 (PST)
