Difference between revisions of "Talk:Konica (I), II and III"
Rebollo fr (talk | contribs) (Advertisement) |
Apocaplops (talk | contribs) |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| + | ==nice page== | ||
| + | This is a great page, has a lot of useful differentiation on the models. Glad I could contribute. Feel free to add any images from the camerapedia pool that I have contributed. I was luckey enough to recently purchase a very nice Konica I setup. -- [[User:Apocaplops|Apocaplops]] 16:18, 25 October 2007 (EDT) | ||
| + | |||
==I screwed up.== | ==I screwed up.== | ||
Revision as of 20:18, 25 October 2007
nice page
This is a great page, has a lot of useful differentiation on the models. Glad I could contribute. Feel free to add any images from the camerapedia pool that I have contributed. I was luckey enough to recently purchase a very nice Konica I setup. -- Apocaplops 16:18, 25 October 2007 (EDT)
I screwed up.
On this edit: Plops turns out to be entirely right. Sure to find evidence to prove him wrong, I went looking -- and thereupon found that what I'd thought was a separate eyepiece was instead the rewind release button (or similar). Duh! Thank you, Plops! -- Hoary 10:12, 6 September 2007 (EDT)
Advertisement
It seems to me that the advertisement is still under copyright. However I'm not sure: it was published in the US and doesn't have the © notice. I would like to have the opinion of someone better informed. Maybe some people at Wikipedia are experts on these things, we could ask them. --Rebollo fr 15:24, 7 October 2007 (EDT)
