Difference between revisions of "Talk:Kodak Retina IIa"
(What does this sample photo accomplish?) |
("example photos" should only be included for very compelling reasons; this has none) |
||
Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
Adding sample photos to every camera in the wiki is just an invitation vanity postings and cluttered pages. A sample photo is only useful if it illustrates how a camera/lens is '''different''' from others. Conventional, clear, sharp photos that could have been taken by a 1997 point-and-shoot do not give the reader any helpful information. --[[User:Voxphoto|Vox]] 16:45, 1 March 2011 (PST) | Adding sample photos to every camera in the wiki is just an invitation vanity postings and cluttered pages. A sample photo is only useful if it illustrates how a camera/lens is '''different''' from others. Conventional, clear, sharp photos that could have been taken by a 1997 point-and-shoot do not give the reader any helpful information. --[[User:Voxphoto|Vox]] 16:45, 1 March 2011 (PST) | ||
+ | |||
+ | :It's almost eleven months since posting the note above, so I am removing the example photo for the reasons given.--[[User:Voxphoto|Vox]] 09:34, 24 January 2012 (PST) |
Latest revision as of 17:34, 24 January 2012
I am leaving the example photo, "Albany Tracks" in the final section. But I would like someone to give me a good justification for why it is there.
Adding sample photos to every camera in the wiki is just an invitation vanity postings and cluttered pages. A sample photo is only useful if it illustrates how a camera/lens is different from others. Conventional, clear, sharp photos that could have been taken by a 1997 point-and-shoot do not give the reader any helpful information. --Vox 16:45, 1 March 2011 (PST)
- It's almost eleven months since posting the note above, so I am removing the example photo for the reasons given.--Vox 09:34, 24 January 2012 (PST)