Difference between revisions of "Talk:Hexar lenses"
John Kratz (talk | contribs) |
Rebollo fr (talk | contribs) (answers) |
||
Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
Somehow a post 1945 date, although possible, does not feel right | Somehow a post 1945 date, although possible, does not feel right | ||
Dirk | Dirk | ||
+ | |||
+ | :Yes I think that these lenses marked ''Konishiroku'' were made between 1943 and 1945 for military use. I have a picture of the F-8 copy showing exactly the same mounting plate as on your own lens. --[[User:Rebollo fr|rebollo_fr]] 18:17, 10 July 2010 (EDT) | ||
________________ | ________________ | ||
This page doesn't mention the Univex Mercury, which was available with a Hexar f/2.0 lens. | This page doesn't mention the Univex Mercury, which was available with a Hexar f/2.0 lens. | ||
+ | |||
+ | :We may add a disambig mention, but the Mercury's Hexar was definitely not made by Konishiroku. --[[User:Rebollo fr|rebollo_fr]] 18:17, 10 July 2010 (EDT) |
Revision as of 22:17, 10 July 2010
I have in hand a Konishiroku Hexar ser. I 25cm/4.5 serial nº 7120 barrel lens (will shoot and upload images this weekend). It' clearly a military lens, possibly for the F-8 equivalent. Am I right in assuming that given its 'Konishiroku' instead of Rokuoh-Sha it's manufactured after 1943? Somehow a post 1945 date, although possible, does not feel right Dirk
- Yes I think that these lenses marked Konishiroku were made between 1943 and 1945 for military use. I have a picture of the F-8 copy showing exactly the same mounting plate as on your own lens. --rebollo_fr 18:17, 10 July 2010 (EDT)
________________
This page doesn't mention the Univex Mercury, which was available with a Hexar f/2.0 lens.
- We may add a disambig mention, but the Mercury's Hexar was definitely not made by Konishiroku. --rebollo_fr 18:17, 10 July 2010 (EDT)