Difference between revisions of "Talk:Depth of field"
(Created page with "Desmond, by all means feel free to swap out the main Konica image I just put on the depth of field page...Maybe a schematic would also be handy...--~~~~") |
(suggest finding a different sample) |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
Desmond, by all means feel free to swap out the main [[Konica (I), II and III |Konica ]] image I just put on the depth of field page...Maybe a schematic would also be handy...--[[User:Heritagefutures|Heritagefutures]] 14:03, 29 January 2012 (PST) | Desmond, by all means feel free to swap out the main [[Konica (I), II and III |Konica ]] image I just put on the depth of field page...Maybe a schematic would also be handy...--[[User:Heritagefutures|Heritagefutures]] 14:03, 29 January 2012 (PST) | ||
| + | :Dirk, the coin images are very helpful. But I'm going to suggest that we remove the Konica image and wait for one that expresses "selective focus" a bit better at 500 pixels wide—preferably something with plainly defocused areas in both foreground & background. It also may momentarily confuse some people whether they're supposed to be noticing some control or marking on the camera that relates to DOF. (Perhaps a clear closeup of the DOF marks on a lens barrel would in fact be useful.)--[[User:Voxphoto|Vox]] 05:19, 30 January 2012 (PST) | ||
Latest revision as of 13:19, 30 January 2012
Desmond, by all means feel free to swap out the main Konica image I just put on the depth of field page...Maybe a schematic would also be handy...--Heritagefutures 14:03, 29 January 2012 (PST)
- Dirk, the coin images are very helpful. But I'm going to suggest that we remove the Konica image and wait for one that expresses "selective focus" a bit better at 500 pixels wide—preferably something with plainly defocused areas in both foreground & background. It also may momentarily confuse some people whether they're supposed to be noticing some control or marking on the camera that relates to DOF. (Perhaps a clear closeup of the DOF marks on a lens barrel would in fact be useful.)--Vox 05:19, 30 January 2012 (PST)
