Talk:Clones, rebadges and rebrands
Revision as of 10:03, 29 March 2011 by Zuleika (talk | contribs) (moved Talk:Clones, Rebadges and Rebrands to Talk:Clones, rebadges and rebrands: they're not proper names)
| This is the discussion page for Clones, rebadges and rebrands. Click here to start a new topic.
|
Not sure the Kiev/Contax is a good example: the Contax factory was taken in reparations, so the first Kievs were made on the same machines, and quite possibly by some of the same people as the Contaxes; is that a copy, or a factory relocation? Someone who knows more of this history may want to edit this. --Dustin McAmera 08:11, 28 March 2011 (PDT)
- I have to agree—that example just muddies the waters. Also it seems like it's worth making a distinction between "pure" rebranding (where all the cameras come off one assembly line, just with minor cosmetic differences) versus cloning/copying (e.g. the Diana Plus or the many Leica copies). I wouldn't object to splitting off those other possibilities into another article. You could check "what links here," and see if they are all cases of pure re-badging, in which case that ought to be the top paragraph. --Vox 08:31, 28 March 2011 (PDT)
