Difference between revisions of "Talk:Baldina"
(Question on photo used....) |
Rebollo fr (talk | contribs) (suggestions) |
||
| Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
Jack Hufnagel | Jack Hufnagel | ||
| + | |||
| + | :You may be right; maybe you could ask details of the camera to the Flickr photographer. We may include the Jubilette in this article by creating a redirect and a link from the [[Balda]] page, and keep the picture with a proper caption. | ||
| + | :By the way, I think it would be better to split the article in two, for the "Baldina (folding)" and "Baldina (rigid)". (These are only title examples, other titles will be fine too.) --[[User:Rebollo fr|rebollo_fr]] 16:34, 4 May 2009 (EDT) | ||
Revision as of 20:34, 4 May 2009
Unless I'm mistaken, the picture here appears to be a Jubilette rather than a Baldina. There appears to be no embossed name on the leather, so it may have been recovered at one time. I might take a picture of my Baldina (a very nice one, I might add) to use instead.
Jack Hufnagel
- You may be right; maybe you could ask details of the camera to the Flickr photographer. We may include the Jubilette in this article by creating a redirect and a link from the Balda page, and keep the picture with a proper caption.
- By the way, I think it would be better to split the article in two, for the "Baldina (folding)" and "Baldina (rigid)". (These are only title examples, other titles will be fine too.) --rebollo_fr 16:34, 4 May 2009 (EDT)
