Difference between revisions of "Talk:Agfa PB 20 Viking"
(Created page with "should this just be a second heading under theAgfa PB 20? see the way most Japanese folders are addressed. Unless the info is vastly more (in word volume) than what's under the...") |
|||
| (One intermediate revision by one other user not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
should this just be a second heading under theAgfa PB 20? see the way most Japanese folders are addressed. Unless the info is vastly more (in word volume) than what's under theAgfa PB 20, I suggest just to make it a second header.. Too many small pages can become tedious for the reader...--[[User:Heritagefutures|Heritagefutures]] 16:38, 27 February 2011 (PST) | should this just be a second heading under theAgfa PB 20? see the way most Japanese folders are addressed. Unless the info is vastly more (in word volume) than what's under theAgfa PB 20, I suggest just to make it a second header.. Too many small pages can become tedious for the reader...--[[User:Heritagefutures|Heritagefutures]] 16:38, 27 February 2011 (PST) | ||
| + | :You're probably right-- It would be similar to how Plenax is treated. I'm still thrashing out the organization of this (while inviting tons of new photos and waiting to see what I get). My original rationale is that this camera has distinctly different finishes, top shutter release, and is one that might be searched for under the Viking name rather than as a PB 20 folder (which seems to be the primary way the others are designated). --[[User:Voxphoto|Vox]] 18:24, 27 February 2011 (PST) | ||
| + | ::Fair enough ;-) --[[User:Heritagefutures|Heritagefutures]] 17:16, 28 February 2011 (PST) | ||
Latest revision as of 01:16, 1 March 2011
should this just be a second heading under theAgfa PB 20? see the way most Japanese folders are addressed. Unless the info is vastly more (in word volume) than what's under theAgfa PB 20, I suggest just to make it a second header.. Too many small pages can become tedious for the reader...--Heritagefutures 16:38, 27 February 2011 (PST)
- You're probably right-- It would be similar to how Plenax is treated. I'm still thrashing out the organization of this (while inviting tons of new photos and waiting to see what I get). My original rationale is that this camera has distinctly different finishes, top shutter release, and is one that might be searched for under the Viking name rather than as a PB 20 folder (which seems to be the primary way the others are designated). --Vox 18:24, 27 February 2011 (PST)
- Fair enough ;-) --Heritagefutures 17:16, 28 February 2011 (PST)
