Difference between revisions of "Talk:Agfa"
(Yes - why not projectors?) |
|||
| Line 20: | Line 20: | ||
==Notes== | ==Notes== | ||
<references /> | <references /> | ||
| + | |||
| + | |||
| + | |||
| + | ---- | ||
| + | |||
| + | : Yes, why not? We have enlargers and light meters creeping in, so why not projectors too? I guess coverage of them will be a bit patchy though. --[[User:Dustin McAmera|Dustin McAmera]] 06:00, 6 February 2012 (PST) | ||
Revision as of 14:00, 6 February 2012
"44" is a funny name for a camera taking 120. Could it be 127? (asks Hoary) --> it was 44 for 120 film
Surely not! There was a (horribly expensive and unreliable) Kodak AE camera some time in the late 1930s. --> if it was horribly expensive it was not manufactured but handcrafted!
Optional Additions ???
Agfa Slide Projectors
- Agfa Agfacolor 50 automatic
- Agfa Diamator 1500 autofocus
- Agfa Diamator 1500 Reflecta CS System
- Agfa Diamator H
- Agfa Diamator m
- Agfa Opticus 100[1]
Notes
- Yes, why not? We have enlargers and light meters creeping in, so why not projectors too? I guess coverage of them will be a bit patchy though. --Dustin McAmera 06:00, 6 February 2012 (PST)
