Difference between revisions of "Category talk:6x6 folding"
Rebollo fr (talk | contribs) (→What does this categorize?: yes) |
(→What does this categorize?: three way?) |
||
Line 4: | Line 4: | ||
:You are right, there is a problem here. As you have said, the probable solution is to create another sub-category, a name suggestion would be "6x6 viewfinder folding" (by analogy with "35mm rangefinder" vs "35mm viewfinder"). The same problem exists in all the categories called "folding". --[[User:Rebollo fr|Rebollo fr]] 06:24, 23 May 2006 (EDT) | :You are right, there is a problem here. As you have said, the probable solution is to create another sub-category, a name suggestion would be "6x6 viewfinder folding" (by analogy with "35mm rangefinder" vs "35mm viewfinder"). The same problem exists in all the categories called "folding". --[[User:Rebollo fr|Rebollo fr]] 06:24, 23 May 2006 (EDT) | ||
+ | |||
+ | That sounds good to me. However, there's no reason to rush. For a moment, let's put the terminology aside. How about a trichotomy: coupled rangefinder, non-coupled rangefinder, and no rangefinder? -- [[User:Hoary|Hoary]] 06:34, 23 May 2006 (EDT) |
Revision as of 10:34, 23 May 2006
What does this categorize?
"6x6 rangefinder folding" is a subcategory of this; does this mean that what is in this larger category are 6x6 folders that don't have rangefinders? Or in other words, could another subcategory (let's call it "6x6 non-rangefinder folding" for a moment, though I'd hope to think of a more elegant alternative) be created, and everything that's now in this category moved to either the one or the other of its subcategories? -- Hoary 06:03, 23 May 2006 (EDT)
- You are right, there is a problem here. As you have said, the probable solution is to create another sub-category, a name suggestion would be "6x6 viewfinder folding" (by analogy with "35mm rangefinder" vs "35mm viewfinder"). The same problem exists in all the categories called "folding". --Rebollo fr 06:24, 23 May 2006 (EDT)
That sounds good to me. However, there's no reason to rush. For a moment, let's put the terminology aside. How about a trichotomy: coupled rangefinder, non-coupled rangefinder, and no rangefinder? -- Hoary 06:34, 23 May 2006 (EDT)