Difference between revisions of "Camera-wiki.org talk:About"
m (titling (I hope Vox doesn't mind)) |
(Name) |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
==More information== | ==More information== | ||
If anyone likes the text I began [[Welcome Mat | on this page]], we we can cut/paste from it to expand <nowiki>[[Camera-wiki.org:About]]</nowiki>. Seems we ought to acknowledge the fork, give newbies a little more info. --[[User:Voxphoto|Vox]] 17:33, 3 February 2011 (CST) | If anyone likes the text I began [[Welcome Mat | on this page]], we we can cut/paste from it to expand <nowiki>[[Camera-wiki.org:About]]</nowiki>. Seems we ought to acknowledge the fork, give newbies a little more info. --[[User:Voxphoto|Vox]] 17:33, 3 February 2011 (CST) | ||
| + | |||
| + | ==Name== | ||
| + | While I'm disinclined to be fanatical about consistency in naming, I do think that consistency helps to give a good impression. As it is, we often see: | ||
| + | *Camera-Wiki | ||
| + | *Camera-wiki | ||
| + | *Camera-wiki.org | ||
| + | and more. | ||
| + | |||
| + | I get the impression that instances with lowercase "w" are commoner than those with uppercase "W", and therefore that the former is better. Is this so? | ||
| + | |||
| + | Sticking ".org" on the end seems a bit pedantic, but perhaps it's at least necessary in any context where it's necessary to distinguish between "Camerapedia.org" (now no more than a set of redirects) and "Camerapedia" (now an area of Wikia.com). Comments? -- [[User:Zuleika|Zuleika]] 17:03, 25 March 2011 (PDT) | ||
Revision as of 00:03, 26 March 2011
More information
If anyone likes the text I began on this page, we we can cut/paste from it to expand [[Camera-wiki.org:About]]. Seems we ought to acknowledge the fork, give newbies a little more info. --Vox 17:33, 3 February 2011 (CST)
Name
While I'm disinclined to be fanatical about consistency in naming, I do think that consistency helps to give a good impression. As it is, we often see:
- Camera-Wiki
- Camera-wiki
- Camera-wiki.org
and more.
I get the impression that instances with lowercase "w" are commoner than those with uppercase "W", and therefore that the former is better. Is this so?
Sticking ".org" on the end seems a bit pedantic, but perhaps it's at least necessary in any context where it's necessary to distinguish between "Camerapedia.org" (now no more than a set of redirects) and "Camerapedia" (now an area of Wikia.com). Comments? -- Zuleika 17:03, 25 March 2011 (PDT)
