Difference between revisions of "Camera-wiki.org:Community discussions/A new home for Camerapedia"

From Camera-wiki.org
Jump to: navigation, search
(Created page with "{| style="text-align: left; background-color: rgb(238, 238, 238); width: 100%;" border="1" cellpadding="10" cellspacing="0" | |- | * This page has been created to host a debate o...")
 
Line 1: Line 1:
{| style="text-align: left; background-color: rgb(238, 238, 238); width: 100%;" border="1" cellpadding="10" cellspacing="0" |
+
Greetings Camerapedia Community,
|-
+
 
|
+
Back in 2004 I asked several of my photoblogging friends to tell me which cameras they owned. It turned into a fun, informal kind of survey that caught some attention. After hundreds of responses I realized that the list of cameras might be helpful somehow, so I posted it onto a wiki. I gave everyone free rein to make sense of the raw data and to start organizing it into pages.
* This page has been created to host a debate on the future of Camerapedia.
+
 
* Don't forget to sign your posts on this discussion page, by using the signature button on top of the editing window.
+
Several people happily took up the challenge and started moving things around. A directory of cameras began to form. It looked like it could actually become an encyclopedia of sorts, so I found a domain name and gave the wiki its own home.
|}
+
 
== Initial discussion==
+
Over 6 years later the project has 39 million views, 96 thousand page edits, 37 thousand Flickr photo uploads, 19 thousand registered users, and thousands of camera articles. Pretty neat.
I have created this page to host a debate on the future of Camerapedia, and more specifically to discuss how to incorporate the informal community into some sort of structure, in order to raise fundings to pay for the hosting service.
+
 
 +
Now it’s time to find the Camerapedia a more permanent and safe place to live. That’s where Wikia comes in.
 +
 
 +
I'm excited to announce that the Camerapedia will be joining the Wikia family of wikis. Over the next week or so, a migration will be taking place and I'd like to share a few of the factors that went into the decision and help answer any questions you may have.
 +
 
 +
Here are a few of the benefits of moving Camerapedia to Wikia:
 +
 
 +
* As the Camerapedia community continues to grow, stability becomes more and more important. By moving, Camerapedia will be on Wikia's world class geographically distributed hosting platform, which should increase speed and reliability for all users world wide.
 +
* We will have access to the entire Wikia team which includes: Programmers, System Administrators, Graphic Designers, Spam Fighters, etc.
 +
* We will have access to all of the Wikia custom wiki extensions and features.
 +
* We will work together with Wikia’s content team to promote and grow the wiki.
 +
 
 +
From the community side, nothing will change. Everyone is welcome to stay in their current roles and Wikia will work to support us in any way possible.
 +
 
 +
Below is a FAQ I have prepared in coordination with Wikia. If you’ve got any additional questions, please post them and myself and Sannse, Sean, and Jeska from Wikia will be happy to answer.
 +
 
 +
I feel that this is the best next step for the Camerapedia project. I’ve spent many years making sure that this site is available to the world, and my aim is to continue in that tradition.
 +
 
 +
I’m very pleased to make this move and hope you will all join me in checking out what Wikia has to offer. We are planning to move to the new servers early next week and although we’ve planned out a smooth technical transition, there are sometimes bumps or bugs in moves like this. I’d encourage all of you to be patient and please let us know if you see any technical issues as we move forward to create Camerapedia’s future together.
 +
 
 +
Cheers,
 +
 
 +
Brandon Stone
 +
 
 +
 
 +
==FAQ==
 +
 
 +
===Why Wikia?===
 +
Wikia hosts many of the largest public wikis so they have got the experience Camerapedia will need as it grows to make sure it stays online and can grow without limits. Wikia has been running for more than 6 years and is a stable company that Camerapedia can rely on long into the future. Wikia offers unlimited bandwidth and server space.
 +
 
 +
===Who owns the content?===
 +
As before, the ownership of the content remains with you, the authors. Wikia hosts the content under the same GFDL license as before, which guarantees your rights as authors are maintained. Wikia has purchased the domain name <camerapedia.org> as part of the moving agreement, and will point this to the new URL at camerapedia.wikia.com.
 +
 
 +
===Will there be ads?===
 +
Ads for logged in users are usually limited to the wiki's home page. The removal of most ads by registering and logging in encourages more people become part of your community. Unregistered readers will see ads. To help in the transition, the first month at Wikia will be ad-free for everyone.
 +
 
 +
===Will my user account change?===
 +
Your current account will be transferred to Wikia. If you already have a Wikia account with the same username, then we can merge the accounts. We will help in resolving any name conflicts for anyone who's account name matches another account on Wikia. More information on user accounts [[User_blog:JeskaD/Information_about_Usernames|in this blog]].
 +
 
 +
===Will the site content or policies change?===
 +
As always, decisions about content and policy are in the hands of the community. Wikia's [http://www.wikia.com/Terms_of_Use terms of use] are designed to give each community as much autonomy as possible in how they run their wiki. Brandon will remain as an admin of the wiki and will be active in its continued growth and development.
 +
 
 +
===Will the look and feel of the site change?===
 +
The default skin for users will be the Wikia skin. Monobook is also available as a personal choice for logged in users. The Wikia skin can be themed to suit the wiki and Wikia will provide professional design if the community wants that help. Or, of course, admins can use our ThemeDesigner tool to create your own theme.
 +
 
 +
===What about the Camerapedia images on Flickr?===
 +
The images used from Flickr will still show up on the new site. Wikia also has a tool to copy photos from Flickr and host them on the wiki, which can prevent any lost photos (for example, if someone's account is no longer available).
 +
 
 +
===Will we get any other new features?===
 +
Wikia has dozens of extensions, some of which are enabled automatically, and many more than can be turned on on request. For example, Wikia has extensions that make it easier to add category galleries, Top Ten lists, standard page layouts, as well as lots of anti-spam tools and emergency anti-vandalism tools to negate the effects that malicious users might have on the site. All of Camerapedia's existing extensions will continue to work.
 +
 
 +
===What about other languages?===
 +
Wikia can create new language editions of Camerapedia very quickly. A new wiki for any language can be created at http://requests.wikia.com/ and these can be linked to Camerapedia via the interlanguage linking system on request.
 +
 
 +
===What about MediaWiki upgrades?===
 +
Wikia stays up to date with the latest stable release of MediaWiki, so upgrades are regularly done, and in a way that does not affect the wiki. You should not experience any downtime as the result of an upgrade.
 +
 
 +
===Will Camerapedia be promoted on Wikia?===
 +
Yes. Camerapedia will be cross promoted on other Wikia sites, which should lead to more users, more editors and more high quality content. Wikia already hosts several other photography and creative wikis, including the epic Canon Hacking wiki http://chdk.wikia.com. Members of Wikia’s content team will work together with Camerapedia to determine what types of promotions, events and other content-focused marketing will best support the community.
 +
 
 +
===Will Wikia be able to help us when we have issues?===
 +
Yes, Wikia’s technical, community support, product and content marketing teams will be available for assistance both during the transition and in the future. The Community Support team is available at all times via email, and talk pages. They can also be available for live chat on request.
 +
 
 +
===I've got other questions, where can I discuss this?===
 +
If you would like to ask Brandon or the Wikia's staff any questions about this move, please post them below.
 +
 
 +
== Further questions and discussion ==
 +
 
 +
===How much was it sold for, and ''what'' was sold?===
 +
 
 +
:I am happy to be the first to ask a question, after [http://www.flickr.com/groups/camerapedia/discuss/72157625827923382/#comment72157625862858504 so much opportunity] for [[Camerapedia.org:Community_Discussions/Future_of_Camerapedia|debate]] was offerred:
 +
:What was the price for this?
 +
:--[[User:Rebollo fr|rebollo_fr]] 17:27, 19 January 2011 (EST)
 +
 
 +
:: The sale of the domain name is a private issue between me and Wikia. Again, the content is not something that I can or did sell. That remains the copyright/property of the authors, hosted under the existing GFDL license. --[[User:Lbstone|Lbstone]] 18:15, 19 January 2011 (EST)
 +
 
 +
:::'''This is a formal notification to [[User:Lbstone|Lbstone]] and the new owners of CAMERAPEDIA at WIKIA.COM that I have pulled out of the CAMERAPEDIA group on FLICKR. I no longer give CAMERAPEDIA permission to use any my images without paying Royalties/Copyright fees. This takes effect of seven (7) days from this posting, or a move of the site to camerapedia.wikia.com, which ever comes earlier. Thank You'''.''... posted by [[User:GitzoCollector|GitzoCollector]] at 00:13, 20 January 2011''
  
As you may know, the website's founder [[User:Lbstone|Lbstone]] has generously paid for the server for a number of years, out of his own pocket, and has taken care of the technical maintenance. This is a situation that is not sustainable, and the community needs to find alternative ways to guarantee its future.
+
:::::I saw your edit summary, GitzoCollector -- there was no intention to ignore this statement, but not really any question for us to answer either. I'm sorry you are unhappy, and hope that you will give us a chance to show you that a move to Wikia's hosting can work well for the wiki. -- [[User:Sannse|Sannse]] 15:02, 24 January 2011 (EST)
 +
::::::The fundamentals have not changed one iota. No, for you there is no question to answer, just to ensure that WIKIA as the new owners is not infringing on my copyright...--[[User:GitzoCollector|GitzoCollector]] 17:02, 24 January 2011 (EST)
  
A few weeks ago, I have offered [[User:Lbstone|Lbstone]] to enter a private discussion with him on that matter (see [http://www.flickr.com/groups/camerapedia/discuss/72157625163819907/#comment72157625389470441 this message of mine]). Through this discussion, I have learned developments that I wish had been made known to the general community earlier.
+
::::I guess that it would be difficult to find admins for good old camerapedia since so many rights issues could occur when image contributors change their policy towards the site.U. Kulick 21:22, 19 January 2011 (EST)
  
I am now setting up this page so that [[User:Lbstone|Lbstone]] can explain what are the options he is currently exploring, and into what sorts of negotiations he has already entered with third parties.
+
{| class="plainlinks floatright" style="text-align: center;"
 +
| [http://www.flickr.com/photos/58511178@N05/5371200541/in/pool-camerapedia http://farm6.static.flickr.com/5008/5371200541_2ef511289c.jpg]
 +
|-
 +
| ''Agreement to have photos appear within Camerapedia''
 +
|}
 +
:::::I am in the middle of joining the group right now. Here's what the process tells me: ''If you add photos to the Camerapedia pool you should know and agree that all pictures of this pool can be linked into the pages of the non-commercial camera encyclopedia website Camerapedia.org.'' No mention in that of the commercial website Wikia.com. -- [[User:Hoary|Hoary]] 21:34, 19 January 2011 (EST)
  
I have asked [[User:Lbstone|Lbstone]] to launch the debate himself, but this has not been done and I now feel like this cannot wait any longer. I will give more specific details of the situation myself tomorrow if he does not jump into the public discussion.
+
:::::Uwe, I haven't changed my polices re 'good old camerapedia' one iota ...as [[User:Hoary|Hoary]] says, when I made my images happily available, and actually went to great lengths and time to make sure I shoot images of the cameras from all angles (a walk-around essentially), I did so as Camerapedia was advertised and publicised as a 'non-commercial camera encyclopedia website'...if matters had stayed non-commercial I would have continued to add many more, which I have ready to shoot...I very strongly believe ''pro bono'' work...I did not change my policies at all, but unfortunately Camerapedia, or to be more specific, [[User:Lbstone|Lbstone]] did....--[[User:GitzoCollector|GitzoCollector]] 21:44, 19 January 2011 (EST)
  
--[[User:Rebollo fr|rebollo_fr]] 07:29, 15 January 2011 (EST)
+
::: [[User:Lbstone|Lbstone]], it's not private when you make money off of a site built on others work that was done for free with the understanding that the site would be non-commercial. We provided content for this site and you make the money off of it? You could not have sold this site without our content providing it commercial worth. In my eyes, that means you dealt with us, the content providers, under false pretenses. Therefore I have removed all of my images from this site as well as the Flickr page and hereby refuse to grant you the right to use or display any of my images until this situation has been rectified. [[User:McFortner|McFortner]] 00:24, 20 January 2011 (EST)
  
: Here's a quick response from me on the mailing list. I hope it helps. My family has had a cluster of birthdays recently, so I'm busy focusing on them at the moment. Will jump in on this as soon as I can. Thanks!
+
===Was the amount of the transaction properly estimated, and on which basis?===
: http://groups.google.com/group/camerawiki/msg/dc09c1fb1337ecf1
+
I will leave up to Wikia Inc.'s paid staff to decide if they made a realistic estimate of the monetary value of the domain name. I would like to hear their comment on what part of this estimate was actually constituted by the work of [[Special:Statistics|19,693]] unpaid volunteers. (In case some of them are tempted to misinterpret my sentence, this is not a call for money and I will refuse any offer.)
: --[[User:Lbstone|Lbstone]] 11:25, 15 January 2011 (EST)
 
  
:: I'm supposíng that [http://groups.google.com/group/camerawiki/browse_thread/thread/837d8886a22bee33# we'll find a way keeping this great non-commercial encyclopedia alive], but if it needs a kind of rebirth I hope that we'll have reason to celebrate that birthday together ;-) U. Kulick 14:13, 15 January 2011 (EST)
+
I also welcome the opinion of unpaid staff, and I would particularly like to hear the opinion of new contributor [[User talk:Sannse|Sannse]] on that interesting matter. (Maybe I'm making a confusion and Sannse is paid too. Any clarification on that subject will be welcome.)
:::I am waiting for Brandon to post his views and comments before I respond in detail. Unless that is known, much will be just stabbing in the dark. That notwithstanding, it should be noted that Camerapedia is a unique web resource that has been built by all contributors, myself included, ''pro bono publico'' (for the common good) without any remuneration--and under the implicit, and on occasion explicit, understanding that the intellectual property which has been donated by the contributors is not 'owned' by a party for commercial gain.--[[User:GitzoCollector|GitzoCollector]] 13:19, 16 January 2011 (EST)
 
::::I see you have already started pulling your Flickr images (see: [[User talk:GitzoCollector#Flickr images?]]) You are free to do that. You should however not mess around with GFDL licensed Camerapedia content, as you did in [[Made in Occupied Japan]]. -- [[User:Petri Krohn|Petri Krohn]] 02:17, January 30, 2011 (UTC)
 
  
== Organization proposal ==
+
My own [[Camerapedia.org:Community_Discussions/Future_of_Camerapedia|decision to review my past correspondence]] with [[User:Lbstone|Lbstone]] may also inspire Wikia Inc.'s paid staff to compare the current [http://www.flickr.com/groups/camerapedia/discuss/72157625827923382/ reactions] posted to this page with the predictions that were presented to them. I'm sure they have infinitely more options than me, humble citizen of a foreign country, to take appropriate action if they feel they have been misleaded in some way or another. --[[User:Rebollo fr|rebollo_fr]] 16:13, 20 January 2011 (EST)
I am still extremely interested at hearing [[User:Lbstone|Lbstone]] explain his plans for the website's future. Waiting for that, I would like to make my own proposal to the community.
 
  
# The money currently needed to run the website is in the order of $60 per month. This amount may be moderately revised upwards in the future if the traffic increases.
+
:As Lbstone said, the details of the domain name sale are confidential, but I'm happy to clarify my role :) I'm work full-time for Wikia, as do Jeska and Sean (which are the other names you are likely to see here). Before Wikia I was a volunteer with Wikipedia and the Wikimedia Foundation, so I've been on wikis for quite a while now. In general, those marked as "staff" on the [http://www.wikia.com/Special:ListUsers Wikia user list] work for Wikia, while "helpers" may be contractors, interns, or volunteers. -- [[User:Sannse|Sannse]] 13:02, 21 January 2011 (EST)
# Some sort of structure is needed to raise that money. One option is to create a non-profit organization (see important note below); this is what looks most reasonable to me.
 
# The members of the authoring community would have the choice to become members of the organization, by making a small contribution on an annual basis, with a low minimum amount.
 
# The organization's founding board would be made of volunteer contributors with a good track record of constructive edits. The organization's statutes would be public, and elections might be organized later.
 
# Donate tags would be placed on the website, and fund-raising campaigns would be made in order to drive more money if necessary.
 
# In case of absolute necessity, unobtrusive advertising space or easily recognizable sponsored links might be sold on behalf of the organization. This would only be made after a public debate has been run.
 
# The organization would compromise itself to function on a non-profit basis, and not to sell the website to a commercial third-party.
 
# It is absolutely necessary that all the legal trademarks and domain names be transferred to the organization. Of course this would require that their current owner [[User:Lbstone|Lbstone]] either donates or sells them.
 
  
Important note: I have no particular knowledge of the US law, and I have no clear view of what is the legal status of a "foundation". However I do understand the inner workings of non-profit [http://fr.wikipedia.org/wiki/Association_loi_de_1901 voluntary associations] in my own country (France). Under that system, associations are tax-free and do not require any capital, provided they are not making a profit. I know for sure that Sylvain Halgand's huge [http://www.collection-appareils.fr/ French camera collecting site] is managed through a system similar to that proposed above.  
+
===Which license will be used?===
 +
Every page of Camerapedia (I think) says that its content is released under the GFDL 1.2. (Indeed, as I write ''this'' I'm told that it's released under GFDL 1.2.)
  
Here are further thoughts on more specific points:
+
[http://www.wikia.com/Licensing Wikia says] that ''Except where otherwise specified, the text on Wikia sites is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike License 3.0 (Unported) (CC-BY-SA).''
* The technical maintenance of the website is certainly doable by volunteers. It is done by Halgand, and in many other websites involving complex databases. However this is a non-trivial task. I have a limited experience of running a Mediawiki site myself, but I would like to make an appeal at other volunteers who have experience of Mediawiki, PHP or MySQL.
 
* The amount of time needed to run the association is certainly not negligible. (Though any affirmation that running the association would actually cost money or require to hire staff would be ridiculous.) I may have to take advice from Halgand or from other associations that I know here. In any case, people having some accounting experience are welcome to come forward and give advice too.
 
  
--[[User:Rebollo fr|rebollo_fr]] 17:08, 17 January 2011 (EST)
+
So what about this new Camerapedia-at-Wikia? Am I right in assuming that it will be a massive GFDL 1.2 exception to the site's general rule of Creative Commons? -- [[User:Hoary|Hoary]] 04:56, 20 January 2011 (EST)
==Founder's response==
 
: That's an ambitious plan, and something I considered in trying to decide how to best continue to guarantee the future stability of this site.  It's also a risky plan. The costs of running a wiki are not insignificant, and will only get larger as we continue to grow.  In addition, the resources needed will increase too... and yes, that may include staff time.  Volunteers are key to any wiki of course, however a growing site also needs an organization that can provide stability and consistent staffing over the long term.  There is always the risk that any one person we rely on will move on over time.  The best option for a the long-term is a stable, established, and reliable host with professional staffing to support the wiki and it's growth.  I've been looking in to that and should have more information soon. --[[User:Lbstone|Lbstone]] 15:15, 18 January 2011 (EST)
 
  
==Answer and Review of preceeding communication==
+
:A quick search led me to these three pages:
::I wished that Lbstone had made a honest address to the readers and authors, instead of those generalities.
+
:* [[Camerapedia.org:GNU_Free_Documentation_License|the GFDL 1.2 as posted at Camerapedia]]
::I have taken the difficult decision to disclose extracts of my e-mail correspondence with [[User:Lbstone|Lbstone]]. I am deeply sorry to make this inelegant move; I only invite you to read and judge the elegance of Lbstone's own projects, and his sincerity towards the wiki community.
+
:* [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/GNU_Free_Documentation_License#Compatibility_with_Creative_Commons_licensing_terms Wikipedia's page on the GFDL] describing how it was '''once''' possible to relicense contents from GFDL '''1.3''' to Creative Commons without actually asking the authors
::(Prior disclosure: 1- any emphasis is mine, 2- these extracts are taken out of larger e-mails, 3- Lbstone has my explicit consent to disclose any other part of that correspondence, 4- I perfectly understand that I will break the wiki rule "Assume good faith", but I sincerely believe that I have enough reasons to do so.)
+
:* [http://www.wikia.com/Licensing Wikia's official licensing policy] stating that all of Wikia contents is under CC-BY-SA 3.0
::* Lbstone on Dec.3: "[...] ''When I first started the Camerapedia, I decided to put it on one of my existing servers''.  It didn't take up much traffic, so ''it was no big deal''.  After a while, though, the Camerapedia was taking up most of the traffic on that server and the other sites were slowing down.  ''Now that I have completed the server switch, Camerapedia is on its very own server'', which I think is the best way to go."
+
:I would be interested to hear the paid Wikia staff to explain the ex-authors of this former community how they will make all this fit together.
::* Rebollo_fr on Dec. 3: "I think it would be fair to share some of the cost with other users or passers-by. We can certainly add a "donate" button somewhere on the site, enabling payments to be made to a Paypal account. I've suggested creating a fundation [...] That said, two important questions are: how much is needed per year to host the server? and how much do you think can be raised through donations?"
+
:--[[User:Rebollo fr|rebollo_fr]] 11:46, 20 January 2011 (EST)
::* Lbstone on Dec.3: "Sounds good.  Going to give this some thought and get back to you on the details."
 
::* ''Silence from Dec. 3 to Dec. 14''
 
::* Lbstone on Dec. 14: "Some interesting things have occurred recently.  I wanted to come to you first to get your thoughts on this. '''A very well-known company has asked to buy the Camerapedia.org domain from me.'''"
 
::* Rebollo_fr on Dec. 15: "can you tell me what is this company?"
 
::* ''Silence from Dec. 15 to Jan. 8''
 
::* Lbstone on Jan. 8: "Since you and I last spoke, I've also been in touch with representatives from that company. [...] ''The plan would be for me to stay on to make sure that the transition moves smoothly and to ensure that the needs of the community are represented.'' [...] This last server migration proved to me that I'm simply not able to maintain everything on my own anymore. This stage of growth is where things complicated. :) I need to hire contractors and professionals who can do server maintenance, and handle accounting and legal issues.  That takes real money. [...] ''I'm currently working on building my own internet company and much of my time is being taken up by that, so I need to move quickly to get Camerapedia in a good place.''"
 
::* Rebollo_fr on Jan. 8: "First, I need to know what is the current cost of the hosting service [...] Second, I need to know what are the other maintenance tasks [...] Third, I can't make a precise idea without knowing the name of the company we're discussing."
 
::* Lbstone on Jan. 10: "I'll get in touch with the company and lay out your specific concerns right away. I want to work out a deal that will benefit everyone, so I'll continue to work hard on this and consult with you until we get to the point of consulting with the greater community.  '''(I want to make sure that I have a chance to do some preliminary work before the whole community is involved.  It's easy to create confusion if the group is brought in too early.)''' [...] To answer your first question, the current hosting and bandwidth cost is around $60/month. [...] I'm at a point where I need to be compensated for my time.  Working on this takes more time than anyone realizes and I need to justify it.  If the site continues to grow, this will become equivalent to a part-time job for me.  (One where I've never been paid.)  Also, I have my own startup company and the board requires that I justify how my time is spent. [...] I would be happy to have Camerapedia as a legitimate part-time job, if the funds are there.  Do you think annual fund drives could make this work?  [...] I'll be talking to the potential buyers soon. Any more thoughts you may have will help me to steer the process in the best direction."
 
::* Rebollo_fr on Jan. 12: "In case you choose to sell the website to a company, I'm not sure of my future position, and I cannot guarantee that I will stay. [...] Of course for now I'm completely in the dark, because it looks like the company does not want you to disclose their name or even business model in advance. I think this is completely foolish on their part, and I take this as a first hint that they do not really understand how to manage the website. It also looks like they are asking you to make the final decision and make some preliminary work without asking the community first (but maybe I've misinterpreted your words). This would be preposterous, and I wouldn't go that route." (The same e-mail also included the plan I'm proposing above.)
 
::* Lbstone on Jan. 13: "I worry that you underestimate what is fully required in order to do this right.  Yes, we could scrape by on a shoestring budget, but that will most certainly cause problems in the future. [...] You're welcome to disagree with my assessment, but ''I feel that the project needs more than you're willing to concede''."
 
::* Rebollo_fr on Jan. 13: "The site's main asset and condition for future growth is its community of writers. [...] In that view, I think that entering funding negotiations with a third party without discussing it in advance with the community was a mistake. To express disrespect by refusing to disclose essential information is another. How do you want me, or any other, to discuss your future projects if we don't even know the company's name or business model? Finally, to actually make a final decision and sell the website before having had a real debate with the other contributors would be a recipe for disaster. [...] What I'm really trying to explain is that you cannot just figure this out alone, then trying to build a favourable consensus afterwards.  You need to build a consensus first with the authoring community, and this involves disclosing information. If the company is not prepared to see a public discussion, then it is not prepared to run the community, period."
 
::* End of discussion.
 
  
::Now here are my comments:
+
::Hi, I'm one of Wikia's Community Support team -- I'm happy to answer questions and help in any way I can.
::# A third-party commercial company has actually offered to buy the domain name, not just take over the maintenance or sponsor the website (see Lbstone, Dec. 14).
+
::The key part of the quote above is "except where otherwise specified". We host a few wikis on licenses other than the CC-by-sa. I think there are still a couple around that decided to stay on the GFDL when we (and Wikipedia) switched to CC-by-sa, and there are a few that use variations on the Creative Commons license. You can see how we show this on each page on [http://memory-alpha.org Memory Alpha] which uses CC-by-nc (Creative Commons, attribution, non-commercial).
::# The name of the company is still unknown, as well as its business model.
+
::And that actually brings me to another point. Wikia provides hosting and support for communities in return for site advertising. The community itself remains non-commercial, but the hosting and support is paid for via the ads rather than by Lbstone personally. This is why we are able to host communities on -nc licenses as well as those that allow commercial use such as the GFDL.
::# Lbstone somehow wanted me to believe that the commercial company spontaneously made an offer between Dec. 3 and Dec. 14, just after the website started to cost him actual money and while we were discussing possible fundings. He may as well want me to believe he received a visit from E.T. or Elvis Presley during the same period.
+
::Images on all wikis may be under licenses different from the text - that information is traditionally added to the file page as a template (I'm not sure if you already use this system, if not I'm happy to help set it up)
::# Lbstone is creating his own Internet company and needs to get rid of Camerapedia quickly (see Lbstone, Jan. 8). He might also welcome some funds, such as those obtained from the sale.
+
::Please let me know if you have other questions on this or anything else -- [[User:Sannse|Sannse]] 13:20, 20 January 2011 (EST)
::# Until Nov. 2010, the website was hosted in one of Lbstone's servers and was not actually costing him any real money (see Lbstone, Dec. 3). As a sidenote, Lbstone has made only two Mediawiki upgrades since 2004 (from 1.5 to 1.6 in 2006, and from 1.6 to 1.16 in 2010). Any talk that he has made huge technical contributions has to be taken with a grain of salt.
+
::::"The community itself remains non-commercial" is utter non-sense. Once you wrap an advertising skin around content, you are making profit from that content...and elegantly so, as you pay nothing for the intellectual content and have others do the work without any financial return to them. --[[User:GitzoCollector|GitzoCollector]] 13:26, 20 January 2011 (EST)
::# Nonetheless, he wanted me to believe that the website will suddenly need to hire people to "do server maintenance, and handle accounting and legal issues" (see Lbstone, Jan. 8). Remember that the website is currently running on a $60 per month hosting budget, has seen two software upgrades in five years plus two or three downtimes implicating a database repair, and that its contents was entirely built by volunteers.
+
:::::The return to the community is in free hosting and support. We offer unlimited bandwidth and storage space (well... no wiki - including some of the biggest online - have found a limit yet ;) as well as a range of staff providing technical and community support.
::# Maybe Lbstone is sincere about having given much time to the project through hidden maintenance tasks. But readers might be interested to check his actual [http://camerapedia.org/wiki?title=Special:Contributions&limit=500&target=Lbstone contributions] to the contents. Please take notice of his level of activity between 2006 and Nov. 2010, and compare with his assumption that Camerapedia has become a sort of part-time job.
+
:::::rebollo_fr said on my talk page "I'm not sure that I completely understood your statement on behalf of Wikia Inc. that it is a non-commercial company". Just to clarify, I'm not saying that Wikia is a non-commercial company, but that our service is compatible with both -nc and other licenses. -- [[User:Sannse|Sannse]] 15:48, 20 January 2011 (EST)
::# Lbstone actually planned (or was asked) not to disclose the sale to the wiki community until it was a done deal (see Lbstone, Jan. 10). His last post to this page indicates that he may still envisage doing that. To me, this is the ugliest aspect of all that story, and this is what prompted me to launch the debate myself, then to publish that correspondence.
 
::I want to make clear that I don't want to work with Lbstone any more, whatever this implies. And Ι specifically ask him to answer two simple questions:
 
::* What is the name of the company involved?
 
::* How much money are they offering for the domain name?
 
::In spite of these negative developments, I still encourage readers and other authors to give their views, and to discuss plans for the future of the website. I'm still ready to take the non-profit route, if enough volunteers come forward to help me. This would require Lbstone to donate the domain name and trademarks to the non-profit organization, and provide minimal technical help so that the transition runs smoothly.
 
::I hope all this will be resolved in a way or another, and that this non-commercial resource will keep in existence.
 
::--[[User:Rebollo fr|rebollo_fr]] 17:33, 18 January 2011 (EST)
 
==Further discussion==
 
@Lbstone
 
  
I think that your embarassing plan is much riskier than fr_rebollo's sound suggestion. A wiki that was explicitely launched as non-commercial wiki project can't be transformed to something else in hands of a big private company. It's a matter of trustworthyness to keep it running as non-commercial as possible. All the contributions made to date were made by people who trusted in this principle, who believed in the indepency of this project.
+
==Photo Rights==
 +
From the FAQ above: <cite>"Wikia also has a tool to copy photos from Flickr and host them on the wiki, which can prevent any lost photos (for example, if someone's account is no longer available). "</cite> - i.e. Wikia will copy our photos, - is this without regard to rights, and keep their own copies? None of my photos are released with unlimited rights, and this looks like an explicit copyright infringement tool, if it is going to copy photos to keep them live after the owner has deleted them or not extended rights for use on the new site. I have not given permission for a commercial site to use my photos without royalty, and should expect Wikia to remove everyone's photos in the same situation. I will consider allowing use once the situation has settled and rights and commercial issues become clearer, and am likely to continue to contribute textual content - but for the moment, I do not allow Wikia to use my images. (AWCam, 02:35, 28 Jan 2011 (GMT))
  
Details of fr_rebollo's plan should be discussed.
+
:This is a tool we have available, not one that ''has'' to be used.  You can see it at [[Special:ImportFreeImages]] or if you click the "add image" icon when editing a page.  It's useful in cases where images have been released under a free license and the community wants to ensure that they can continue to use the images... even if there is a problem with the Flick account.  I understand there was a case a while back when someone's account was closed on Flickr and images here stopped working - although the use here under a CC license was still valid.  We can also use similar tools to import specific freely licensed images to the wiki.
  
What we need is a team. If a wiki server is set up there's usually a way for enabling remote admin work for a second and a third technical admin. We already have fr_rebollo as contents admin. There should be more (active!) contents admins, and not the attempt to drive out the last active contents admin and busiest wiki contributor by plans which sound horrible or which are made without him!
+
:Please see [[Camerapedia:Community Discussions/Unauthorised use of images]] here for more on "with permission" images - in short, permission was given to Camerapedia, and Camerapedia still exists (even if with a new host). That permission can be revoked, but it certainly doesn't seem necessary to ''assume'' it will be.
  
Who says that the team needed can't be built with volunteers? The world is full of wikis, forums, blogs and so on with volunteering admins. But this concept is only justified if the related projects are non-commercial anyway. And we are obliged to keep the non-commercial concept - the trustworthyness of the whole project is based on that.
+
:For your personal images, if you withdraw permission, then the easiest thing to do is to remove the links.  Given a list of images, I can help... but obviously you and the community here are more likely to know exactly what images you mean, and it's as quick to make the changes as it is to list them for me.  For ''offical'' copyright complaints (which I hope won't be necessary of course) please see our [http://www.wikia.com/Terms_of_Use Terms of Use]] -- [[User:Sannse|sannse]] http://images2.wikia.nocookie.net/__cb32675/wikia/images/e/e9/WikiaStaff.png  <small>([[w:c:community:Forum:Community_Central_Forum|help forum]] | [[w:c:community:Blog:Wikia_Staff_Blog |blog]])</small>  20:02, January 28, 2011 (UTC)
  
I myself was asked by a commercial organization to offer my camera images to it. I withstood, since my camera images in our pool are explicitely dedicated to this, to Your, to our fine independent non-commercial wiki project. Please don't destroy it!
+
==Skin and URL==
  
But then there are still costs for organizing stuff like the server, a friendly correspondence with a friendly institution that might offer us a read-only backup database location, and some necessary communication with Flickr. There must be no fear to start asking the community for some funding. A report about the achieved amount and its usage must be made every year. The wiki community itself helps to create the necessary pages about the funding topic. If You, Lbstone, are not able to maintain such a sound transition to a well-funded and better maintained project, or even further towards fr_rebollo's fine democratic approach, then You should help the project to be thouroughly transferred onto a server which has to be found by the community, the community in which You will always be welcome as honorary founding member. Best regards U. Kulick 20:12, 18 January 2011 (EST)
+
We are used to have the floating-size standard wiki-page format. Some pages are already designed for broader view, on other pages the authors kept an eye on formatting images and text together so that all fits well in a narrow window and perfectly in a wider screen browser window. I saw that Your humourous [http://www.uncyclopeda.org Uncyclopedia] has that classic floating size page format - free for all non-paying visitors! We would need the free-floating frame-format to go on with our work. It would be also much more than nice if the pages would be shown under www.camerapedia.org adress. These essential points are two very important technical conditions to have at least a glimpse of chance to keep some community together! But You might have learned that there are much more rights issues to solve and even more emotional conditions to achieve a change of mind of certain project founders, main actors an contributors. (U. Kulick 05:50, 21 January 2011 (EST))
  
==Announcement from Brandon==
+
:Uncyclopedia is an odd case... They are a direct parody of Wikipedia, and so use a similar skin to them in order to reinforce the joke. Other than that unusual situation, we currently use the Wikia skin -- which is a more modern look and one that has a lot more features than the old Monobook skin. The Wikia skin is customizable and can be given a theme by admins, or we can ask our design staff to create a theme for you. If you look around Wikia, you'll see [http://ghostintheshell.wikia.com/wiki/Main_Page many], [http://ourbrant.wikia.com/wiki/Our_Brant varied], [http://carnivale.wikia.com/wiki/Main_Page themes] that will give you an idea of what's possible. Many more examples [http://community.wikia.com/wiki/Community_Central:Content_Team here].
As I mentioned before, my goal here is to make sure that Camerapedia continues to be stable, available and open for all of us. The problems I've talked about in my emails to rebollo_fr are real and immediate, and I see it as my responsibility as founder and host to make sure that this wiki has an infrastructure in place that will keep it going long-term. That's what I'm currently working on getting set up. I'm sorry if the delay in writing about this has worried people, but I wanted to be sure we had everything in place and organized fully before I jumped ahead with an announcement. I think everything is together now, so please see [[Camerapedia.org:Community_Discussions/A_New_Home_for_Camerapedia|A New Home for Camerapedia]] for more.
+
:The major advantage of a fixed-width skin is that you get consistency of view for all readers. One problem we saw with the flexible width framework was those pages you mention that are designed for a broader view - some of your readers will be having problems with those pages already. Although those pages may need initial tweaking, the long-term effect will be a design that works on all screen resolutions and shows off your articles to their best advantage for all viewers. We are available to help with any of these types of page formatting issues during the transition.
 +
: We've had quite a few wikis move to us over the years, including Uncyclopedia, and have learned a lot about what works. We've found that the most practical URL to use is a subdomain of wikia.com - Uncyclopedia moved to this URL style a couple of years ago. We will redirect camerapedia.org to the new address, so all old links will still work.
 +
: In our experience, the most important part of a move to Wikia is that we can provide a stable long-term home -- and the support to make sure the transition is as comfortable as possible for the whole community. -- [[User:Sannse|Sannse]] 13:51, 21 January 2011 (EST)

Revision as of 01:34, 31 January 2011

Greetings Camerapedia Community,

Back in 2004 I asked several of my photoblogging friends to tell me which cameras they owned. It turned into a fun, informal kind of survey that caught some attention. After hundreds of responses I realized that the list of cameras might be helpful somehow, so I posted it onto a wiki. I gave everyone free rein to make sense of the raw data and to start organizing it into pages.

Several people happily took up the challenge and started moving things around. A directory of cameras began to form. It looked like it could actually become an encyclopedia of sorts, so I found a domain name and gave the wiki its own home.

Over 6 years later the project has 39 million views, 96 thousand page edits, 37 thousand Flickr photo uploads, 19 thousand registered users, and thousands of camera articles. Pretty neat.

Now it’s time to find the Camerapedia a more permanent and safe place to live. That’s where Wikia comes in.

I'm excited to announce that the Camerapedia will be joining the Wikia family of wikis. Over the next week or so, a migration will be taking place and I'd like to share a few of the factors that went into the decision and help answer any questions you may have.

Here are a few of the benefits of moving Camerapedia to Wikia:

  • As the Camerapedia community continues to grow, stability becomes more and more important. By moving, Camerapedia will be on Wikia's world class geographically distributed hosting platform, which should increase speed and reliability for all users world wide.
  • We will have access to the entire Wikia team which includes: Programmers, System Administrators, Graphic Designers, Spam Fighters, etc.
  • We will have access to all of the Wikia custom wiki extensions and features.
  • We will work together with Wikia’s content team to promote and grow the wiki.

From the community side, nothing will change. Everyone is welcome to stay in their current roles and Wikia will work to support us in any way possible.

Below is a FAQ I have prepared in coordination with Wikia. If you’ve got any additional questions, please post them and myself and Sannse, Sean, and Jeska from Wikia will be happy to answer.

I feel that this is the best next step for the Camerapedia project. I’ve spent many years making sure that this site is available to the world, and my aim is to continue in that tradition.

I’m very pleased to make this move and hope you will all join me in checking out what Wikia has to offer. We are planning to move to the new servers early next week and although we’ve planned out a smooth technical transition, there are sometimes bumps or bugs in moves like this. I’d encourage all of you to be patient and please let us know if you see any technical issues as we move forward to create Camerapedia’s future together.

Cheers,

Brandon Stone


FAQ

Why Wikia?

Wikia hosts many of the largest public wikis so they have got the experience Camerapedia will need as it grows to make sure it stays online and can grow without limits. Wikia has been running for more than 6 years and is a stable company that Camerapedia can rely on long into the future. Wikia offers unlimited bandwidth and server space.

Who owns the content?

As before, the ownership of the content remains with you, the authors. Wikia hosts the content under the same GFDL license as before, which guarantees your rights as authors are maintained. Wikia has purchased the domain name <camerapedia.org> as part of the moving agreement, and will point this to the new URL at camerapedia.wikia.com.

Will there be ads?

Ads for logged in users are usually limited to the wiki's home page. The removal of most ads by registering and logging in encourages more people become part of your community. Unregistered readers will see ads. To help in the transition, the first month at Wikia will be ad-free for everyone.

Will my user account change?

Your current account will be transferred to Wikia. If you already have a Wikia account with the same username, then we can merge the accounts. We will help in resolving any name conflicts for anyone who's account name matches another account on Wikia. More information on user accounts in this blog.

Will the site content or policies change?

As always, decisions about content and policy are in the hands of the community. Wikia's terms of use are designed to give each community as much autonomy as possible in how they run their wiki. Brandon will remain as an admin of the wiki and will be active in its continued growth and development.

Will the look and feel of the site change?

The default skin for users will be the Wikia skin. Monobook is also available as a personal choice for logged in users. The Wikia skin can be themed to suit the wiki and Wikia will provide professional design if the community wants that help. Or, of course, admins can use our ThemeDesigner tool to create your own theme.

What about the Camerapedia images on Flickr?

The images used from Flickr will still show up on the new site. Wikia also has a tool to copy photos from Flickr and host them on the wiki, which can prevent any lost photos (for example, if someone's account is no longer available).

Will we get any other new features?

Wikia has dozens of extensions, some of which are enabled automatically, and many more than can be turned on on request. For example, Wikia has extensions that make it easier to add category galleries, Top Ten lists, standard page layouts, as well as lots of anti-spam tools and emergency anti-vandalism tools to negate the effects that malicious users might have on the site. All of Camerapedia's existing extensions will continue to work.

What about other languages?

Wikia can create new language editions of Camerapedia very quickly. A new wiki for any language can be created at http://requests.wikia.com/ and these can be linked to Camerapedia via the interlanguage linking system on request.

What about MediaWiki upgrades?

Wikia stays up to date with the latest stable release of MediaWiki, so upgrades are regularly done, and in a way that does not affect the wiki. You should not experience any downtime as the result of an upgrade.

Will Camerapedia be promoted on Wikia?

Yes. Camerapedia will be cross promoted on other Wikia sites, which should lead to more users, more editors and more high quality content. Wikia already hosts several other photography and creative wikis, including the epic Canon Hacking wiki http://chdk.wikia.com. Members of Wikia’s content team will work together with Camerapedia to determine what types of promotions, events and other content-focused marketing will best support the community.

Will Wikia be able to help us when we have issues?

Yes, Wikia’s technical, community support, product and content marketing teams will be available for assistance both during the transition and in the future. The Community Support team is available at all times via email, and talk pages. They can also be available for live chat on request.

I've got other questions, where can I discuss this?

If you would like to ask Brandon or the Wikia's staff any questions about this move, please post them below.

Further questions and discussion

How much was it sold for, and what was sold?

I am happy to be the first to ask a question, after so much opportunity for debate was offerred:
What was the price for this?
--rebollo_fr 17:27, 19 January 2011 (EST)
The sale of the domain name is a private issue between me and Wikia. Again, the content is not something that I can or did sell. That remains the copyright/property of the authors, hosted under the existing GFDL license. --Lbstone 18:15, 19 January 2011 (EST)
This is a formal notification to Lbstone and the new owners of CAMERAPEDIA at WIKIA.COM that I have pulled out of the CAMERAPEDIA group on FLICKR. I no longer give CAMERAPEDIA permission to use any my images without paying Royalties/Copyright fees. This takes effect of seven (7) days from this posting, or a move of the site to camerapedia.wikia.com, which ever comes earlier. Thank You.... posted by GitzoCollector at 00:13, 20 January 2011
I saw your edit summary, GitzoCollector -- there was no intention to ignore this statement, but not really any question for us to answer either. I'm sorry you are unhappy, and hope that you will give us a chance to show you that a move to Wikia's hosting can work well for the wiki. -- Sannse 15:02, 24 January 2011 (EST)
The fundamentals have not changed one iota. No, for you there is no question to answer, just to ensure that WIKIA as the new owners is not infringing on my copyright...--GitzoCollector 17:02, 24 January 2011 (EST)
I guess that it would be difficult to find admins for good old camerapedia since so many rights issues could occur when image contributors change their policy towards the site.U. Kulick 21:22, 19 January 2011 (EST)
I am in the middle of joining the group right now. Here's what the process tells me: If you add photos to the Camerapedia pool you should know and agree that all pictures of this pool can be linked into the pages of the non-commercial camera encyclopedia website Camerapedia.org. No mention in that of the commercial website Wikia.com. -- Hoary 21:34, 19 January 2011 (EST)
Uwe, I haven't changed my polices re 'good old camerapedia' one iota ...as Hoary says, when I made my images happily available, and actually went to great lengths and time to make sure I shoot images of the cameras from all angles (a walk-around essentially), I did so as Camerapedia was advertised and publicised as a 'non-commercial camera encyclopedia website'...if matters had stayed non-commercial I would have continued to add many more, which I have ready to shoot...I very strongly believe pro bono work...I did not change my policies at all, but unfortunately Camerapedia, or to be more specific, Lbstone did....--GitzoCollector 21:44, 19 January 2011 (EST)
Lbstone, it's not private when you make money off of a site built on others work that was done for free with the understanding that the site would be non-commercial. We provided content for this site and you make the money off of it? You could not have sold this site without our content providing it commercial worth. In my eyes, that means you dealt with us, the content providers, under false pretenses. Therefore I have removed all of my images from this site as well as the Flickr page and hereby refuse to grant you the right to use or display any of my images until this situation has been rectified. McFortner 00:24, 20 January 2011 (EST)

Was the amount of the transaction properly estimated, and on which basis?

I will leave up to Wikia Inc.'s paid staff to decide if they made a realistic estimate of the monetary value of the domain name. I would like to hear their comment on what part of this estimate was actually constituted by the work of 19,693 unpaid volunteers. (In case some of them are tempted to misinterpret my sentence, this is not a call for money and I will refuse any offer.)

I also welcome the opinion of unpaid staff, and I would particularly like to hear the opinion of new contributor Sannse on that interesting matter. (Maybe I'm making a confusion and Sannse is paid too. Any clarification on that subject will be welcome.)

My own decision to review my past correspondence with Lbstone may also inspire Wikia Inc.'s paid staff to compare the current reactions posted to this page with the predictions that were presented to them. I'm sure they have infinitely more options than me, humble citizen of a foreign country, to take appropriate action if they feel they have been misleaded in some way or another. --rebollo_fr 16:13, 20 January 2011 (EST)

As Lbstone said, the details of the domain name sale are confidential, but I'm happy to clarify my role :) I'm work full-time for Wikia, as do Jeska and Sean (which are the other names you are likely to see here). Before Wikia I was a volunteer with Wikipedia and the Wikimedia Foundation, so I've been on wikis for quite a while now. In general, those marked as "staff" on the Wikia user list work for Wikia, while "helpers" may be contractors, interns, or volunteers. -- Sannse 13:02, 21 January 2011 (EST)

Which license will be used?

Every page of Camerapedia (I think) says that its content is released under the GFDL 1.2. (Indeed, as I write this I'm told that it's released under GFDL 1.2.)

Wikia says that Except where otherwise specified, the text on Wikia sites is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike License 3.0 (Unported) (CC-BY-SA).

So what about this new Camerapedia-at-Wikia? Am I right in assuming that it will be a massive GFDL 1.2 exception to the site's general rule of Creative Commons? -- Hoary 04:56, 20 January 2011 (EST)

A quick search led me to these three pages:
I would be interested to hear the paid Wikia staff to explain the ex-authors of this former community how they will make all this fit together.
--rebollo_fr 11:46, 20 January 2011 (EST)
Hi, I'm one of Wikia's Community Support team -- I'm happy to answer questions and help in any way I can.
The key part of the quote above is "except where otherwise specified". We host a few wikis on licenses other than the CC-by-sa. I think there are still a couple around that decided to stay on the GFDL when we (and Wikipedia) switched to CC-by-sa, and there are a few that use variations on the Creative Commons license. You can see how we show this on each page on Memory Alpha which uses CC-by-nc (Creative Commons, attribution, non-commercial).
And that actually brings me to another point. Wikia provides hosting and support for communities in return for site advertising. The community itself remains non-commercial, but the hosting and support is paid for via the ads rather than by Lbstone personally. This is why we are able to host communities on -nc licenses as well as those that allow commercial use such as the GFDL.
Images on all wikis may be under licenses different from the text - that information is traditionally added to the file page as a template (I'm not sure if you already use this system, if not I'm happy to help set it up)
Please let me know if you have other questions on this or anything else -- Sannse 13:20, 20 January 2011 (EST)
"The community itself remains non-commercial" is utter non-sense. Once you wrap an advertising skin around content, you are making profit from that content...and elegantly so, as you pay nothing for the intellectual content and have others do the work without any financial return to them. --GitzoCollector 13:26, 20 January 2011 (EST)
The return to the community is in free hosting and support. We offer unlimited bandwidth and storage space (well... no wiki - including some of the biggest online - have found a limit yet ;) as well as a range of staff providing technical and community support.
rebollo_fr said on my talk page "I'm not sure that I completely understood your statement on behalf of Wikia Inc. that it is a non-commercial company". Just to clarify, I'm not saying that Wikia is a non-commercial company, but that our service is compatible with both -nc and other licenses. -- Sannse 15:48, 20 January 2011 (EST)

Photo Rights

From the FAQ above: "Wikia also has a tool to copy photos from Flickr and host them on the wiki, which can prevent any lost photos (for example, if someone's account is no longer available). " - i.e. Wikia will copy our photos, - is this without regard to rights, and keep their own copies? None of my photos are released with unlimited rights, and this looks like an explicit copyright infringement tool, if it is going to copy photos to keep them live after the owner has deleted them or not extended rights for use on the new site. I have not given permission for a commercial site to use my photos without royalty, and should expect Wikia to remove everyone's photos in the same situation. I will consider allowing use once the situation has settled and rights and commercial issues become clearer, and am likely to continue to contribute textual content - but for the moment, I do not allow Wikia to use my images. (AWCam, 02:35, 28 Jan 2011 (GMT))

This is a tool we have available, not one that has to be used. You can see it at Special:ImportFreeImages or if you click the "add image" icon when editing a page. It's useful in cases where images have been released under a free license and the community wants to ensure that they can continue to use the images... even if there is a problem with the Flick account. I understand there was a case a while back when someone's account was closed on Flickr and images here stopped working - although the use here under a CC license was still valid. We can also use similar tools to import specific freely licensed images to the wiki.
Please see Camerapedia:Community Discussions/Unauthorised use of images here for more on "with permission" images - in short, permission was given to Camerapedia, and Camerapedia still exists (even if with a new host). That permission can be revoked, but it certainly doesn't seem necessary to assume it will be.
For your personal images, if you withdraw permission, then the easiest thing to do is to remove the links. Given a list of images, I can help... but obviously you and the community here are more likely to know exactly what images you mean, and it's as quick to make the changes as it is to list them for me. For offical copyright complaints (which I hope won't be necessary of course) please see our Terms of Use] -- sannse http://images2.wikia.nocookie.net/__cb32675/wikia/images/e/e9/WikiaStaff.png (help forum | blog) 20:02, January 28, 2011 (UTC)

Skin and URL

We are used to have the floating-size standard wiki-page format. Some pages are already designed for broader view, on other pages the authors kept an eye on formatting images and text together so that all fits well in a narrow window and perfectly in a wider screen browser window. I saw that Your humourous Uncyclopedia has that classic floating size page format - free for all non-paying visitors! We would need the free-floating frame-format to go on with our work. It would be also much more than nice if the pages would be shown under www.camerapedia.org adress. These essential points are two very important technical conditions to have at least a glimpse of chance to keep some community together! But You might have learned that there are much more rights issues to solve and even more emotional conditions to achieve a change of mind of certain project founders, main actors an contributors. (U. Kulick 05:50, 21 January 2011 (EST))

Uncyclopedia is an odd case... They are a direct parody of Wikipedia, and so use a similar skin to them in order to reinforce the joke. Other than that unusual situation, we currently use the Wikia skin -- which is a more modern look and one that has a lot more features than the old Monobook skin. The Wikia skin is customizable and can be given a theme by admins, or we can ask our design staff to create a theme for you. If you look around Wikia, you'll see many, varied, themes that will give you an idea of what's possible. Many more examples here.
The major advantage of a fixed-width skin is that you get consistency of view for all readers. One problem we saw with the flexible width framework was those pages you mention that are designed for a broader view - some of your readers will be having problems with those pages already. Although those pages may need initial tweaking, the long-term effect will be a design that works on all screen resolutions and shows off your articles to their best advantage for all viewers. We are available to help with any of these types of page formatting issues during the transition.
We've had quite a few wikis move to us over the years, including Uncyclopedia, and have learned a lot about what works. We've found that the most practical URL to use is a subdomain of wikia.com - Uncyclopedia moved to this URL style a couple of years ago. We will redirect camerapedia.org to the new address, so all old links will still work.
In our experience, the most important part of a move to Wikia is that we can provide a stable long-term home -- and the support to make sure the transition is as comfortable as possible for the whole community. -- Sannse 13:51, 21 January 2011 (EST)