Difference between revisions of "Camera-wiki.org:Community discussions"
(started an icebreaker discussion) |
|||
| Line 5: | Line 5: | ||
===Intro=== | ===Intro=== | ||
Add your discussion topics here. Give each topic a header like this intro's header <nowiki>===Intro===</nowiki> | Add your discussion topics here. Give each topic a header like this intro's header <nowiki>===Intro===</nowiki> | ||
| + | |||
| + | |||
| + | '''Image Uses''' | ||
| + | |||
| + | Going forward, I feel there are a couple of areas where Camerawiki could use some refinement. The first is pushing for a more standardized way to embed images in pages--always including the essentials of a link back to the source, identifying the contributor, and stating the license terms. The first is mandatory to use Flickr-hosted images in a way consistent with their terms of service. | ||
| + | |||
| + | Another area needing work is to aim for greater visual consistency between pages, which currently can be a bit chaotic. There's no standard for the image dimensions used, so some pages have excessively tiny thumbnails. The wiki markup syntax is not the most intuitive (not to me, anyway) when it comes to understanding how photos align or how text wraps, and so odd collisions with text often occur. I'd like to work with folks more familiar with the wiki markup language to define some "best practices" for nicer-looking pages. | ||
| + | --[[User:Voxphoto|Vox]] 19:17, 30 January 2011 (CST) | ||
Revision as of 01:17, 31 January 2011
Old site discussions, see Camerapedia.org:Community Discussions
Discussions
Intro
Add your discussion topics here. Give each topic a header like this intro's header ===Intro===
Image Uses
Going forward, I feel there are a couple of areas where Camerawiki could use some refinement. The first is pushing for a more standardized way to embed images in pages--always including the essentials of a link back to the source, identifying the contributor, and stating the license terms. The first is mandatory to use Flickr-hosted images in a way consistent with their terms of service.
Another area needing work is to aim for greater visual consistency between pages, which currently can be a bit chaotic. There's no standard for the image dimensions used, so some pages have excessively tiny thumbnails. The wiki markup syntax is not the most intuitive (not to me, anyway) when it comes to understanding how photos align or how text wraps, and so odd collisions with text often occur. I'd like to work with folks more familiar with the wiki markup language to define some "best practices" for nicer-looking pages. --Vox 19:17, 30 January 2011 (CST)
