Difference between revisions of "Ambrotype"

From Camera-wiki.org
Jump to: navigation, search
m (fixed two broken img, +headers)
Line 1: Line 1:
 
{|class=plainlinks
 
{|class=plainlinks
 
||[http://www.flickr.com/photos/library_of_congress/3252917783/ http://farm4.static.flickr.com/3093/3252917783_e81308e684_m.jpg]
 
||[http://www.flickr.com/photos/library_of_congress/3252917783/ http://farm4.static.flickr.com/3093/3252917783_e81308e684_m.jpg]
||[http://www.flickr.com/photos/library_of_congress/5228576175/ http://farm6.static.flickr.com/5085/5228576175_283a7e3ca8_m.jpg]
+
||[http://www.flickr.com/photos/library_of_congress/5228576175/ http://farm6.staticflickr.com/5085/5228576175_a999bdab81_m.jpg]
||[http://www.flickr.com/photos/library_of_congress/5229146672/ http://farm6.static.flickr.com/5050/5229146672_d920df9405_m.jpg]
+
||[http://www.flickr.com/photos/library_of_congress/5229146672/ http://farm6.staticflickr.com/5050/5229146672_e827d2f703_m.jpg]
 
|-
 
|-
 
|colspan=3|Abraham Lincoln, Union soldier, girl with image of her father, images: Library of Congress {{public domain}}
 
|colspan=3|Abraham Lincoln, Union soldier, girl with image of her father, images: Library of Congress {{public domain}}
Line 14: Line 14:
 
Ambrotypes were often hand-tinted to increase the contrast; without this, Ambrotypes are grayish-white and compare poorly to [[Daguerreotype Process|Daguerreotypes]].
 
Ambrotypes were often hand-tinted to increase the contrast; without this, Ambrotypes are grayish-white and compare poorly to [[Daguerreotype Process|Daguerreotypes]].
  
 +
==Notes==
 
<references />
 
<references />
  
 +
==Links==
 
* [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ambrotype Wikipedia: Ambrotype] - apparently wrongly attributes the invention to Cutting, [http://www.google.com/patents?id=9wcdAAAAEBAJ&printsec=abstract&zoom=4&dq=ambrotype+1854 whose patent] only mentions the varnish or balsam back coating.
 
* [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ambrotype Wikipedia: Ambrotype] - apparently wrongly attributes the invention to Cutting, [http://www.google.com/patents?id=9wcdAAAAEBAJ&printsec=abstract&zoom=4&dq=ambrotype+1854 whose patent] only mentions the varnish or balsam back coating.
  
 
[[Category: Photographic processes]]
 
[[Category: Photographic processes]]

Revision as of 15:57, 30 March 2012

Ambrotype is a photographic process resulting in positives on glass, originated by Frederick Scott Archer and Peter W Fry in 1851[1]. It was intended as a cheaper alternative to the Daguerreotype. It is based on the wet-collodion process. It was also known, in Britain, as "collodion positive", and in other places as "Melainotype".

Glass plates are prepared, and developed as in the wet-collodion process, but underexposed. This gives a less dark glass negative. The negative is treated with mercuric bichloride to whiten the exposed areas. The plate is mounted in a metal frame with a black background. The background makes the negative appear positive - as the whitened silvered areas reflect light, and the transparent areas show the black background.

The back was sometimes varnished or coated with balsam to improve the image; James Ambrose Cutting of Boston was granted a US patent in 1854[2] on a method of doing this - which makes the image "greatly increased in strength and beauty by imparting additional brilliancy".

Ambrotypes were often hand-tinted to increase the contrast; without this, Ambrotypes are grayish-white and compare poorly to Daguerreotypes.

Notes

  1. Focal Encyclopedia of Photography, Focal Press, 1976 edition, p.40
  2. US Patent 11,267: Improvement in Photographic Pictures on Glass

Links