Difference between revisions of "828 film"
(spool image added) |
m (smaller cameras) |
||
Line 5: | Line 5: | ||
|image_text= 828 film spool compared<br>to modern 35mm cassette | |image_text= 828 film spool compared<br>to modern 35mm cassette | ||
}} | }} | ||
− | '''828''' film was [[Kodak]]'s unperforated 35mm paper-backed [[rollfilm|roll film]], introduced in 1935. 828 was intended to avoid some of the problems of the early perforated 35mm films. [[Kodak Bantam | Kodak's Bantam]] camera series used 828 film. | + | '''828''' film was [[Kodak]]'s unperforated 35mm paper-backed [[rollfilm|roll film]], introduced in 1935. 828 was intended to avoid some of the problems of the early perforated 35mm films. The smaller diameter spool and lack of need for a sprocket allowed for much spaller camera designs. [[Kodak Bantam | Kodak's Bantam]] camera series used 828 film. |
==Links== | ==Links== |
Revision as of 18:42, 5 May 2008
828 film spool compared to modern 35mm cassette |
828 film was Kodak's unperforated 35mm paper-backed roll film, introduced in 1935. 828 was intended to avoid some of the problems of the early perforated 35mm films. The smaller diameter spool and lack of need for a sprocket allowed for much spaller camera designs. Kodak's Bantam camera series used 828 film.
Links
- 828 film (by Brian Wallen), concentrating on how to keep cameras designed for 828 supplied with film (unperforated 35mm)
- "Feeding a classic" (a thread at Nelsonfoto forums), about using cut-down 120 film