Difference between revisions of "User talk:Latente"
Rebollo fr (talk | contribs) (→need standard camera template...: about the "impossible" generic template) |
Steevithak (talk | contribs) m (corrected internal link to from cp to cw) |
||
| Line 5: | Line 5: | ||
== need standard camera template... == | == need standard camera template... == | ||
| − | for this page http:// | + | for this page http://camera-wiki.org/wiki/Durst_66 |
thaks | thaks | ||
Latest revision as of 01:21, 6 February 2012
Bencini camera
That's a neat camera at Talk:127 film. The article on Bencini is very feeble right now; could you perhaps add to it? (I can't because I know absolutely nothing about Bencini cameras.) -- Hoary 19:54, 1 August 2006 (EDT)
need standard camera template...
for this page http://camera-wiki.org/wiki/Durst_66 thaks
- Hello.
- There is a Template:Infobox_Camera and a Template:Camera that are near duplicates. Nobody has really used them. In my opinion they are unusable because there are too many entries and we cannot get rid of the unneeded entries selectively (like the number of pixels for film cameras, or the frames per second for cameras without a motordrive, etc.). This would need an update of the Mediawiki software and the install of a software extension and this is not likely to happen very soon. There were attempts to make more specialized templates, listed in the Category:Infobox templates but they are not extremely satisfying either.
- If none of this satisfies you, as is likely to happen, the best way to describe a camera is to forget about templates and to write sentences.
- --Rebollo fr 10:48, 12 January 2007 (EST)
