Difference between revisions of "User:Hoarier"
m |
m |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
Hi Hoarier | Hi Hoarier | ||
| − | I just sought the text were I first heard of "be bold" wiki philosophy and linked the new [[be bold]] page to that text passage (of You). I remembered it when I found a similar "be courageous" hint in a German wiki, | + | I just sought the text were I first heard of "be bold" wiki philosophy and linked the new [[be bold]] page to that text passage (of You). I remembered it when I found a similar "be courageous" hint in a German wiki, and now I found the related page in Wikipedia. So You didn't necessarily needed to revert that "tampering", it was just a special attempt of honoring Your idea as being established now in this wiki. I made the new page because some makers of this project already became too doubtful concerning changes, because they could be "damaging" to the whole project. But I learned from another wiki: No change, no life. We want a living project, so we can't discourage change. If we won't allow anonymous edits that would be good, but the ones who have decided to become project members shall not be discouraged by doubtful discussions, they should find a place to become creative with their ideas to enrich this camera knowledge base. Be bold, of course carefully, not loosing view for good compromises and consent, and let this wiki grow. |
Best regards, [[User:U. kulick|U. Kulick]] 10:52, 29 April 2011 (PDT) | Best regards, [[User:U. kulick|U. Kulick]] 10:52, 29 April 2011 (PDT) | ||
Revision as of 17:53, 29 April 2011
Hi Hoarier
I just sought the text were I first heard of "be bold" wiki philosophy and linked the new be bold page to that text passage (of You). I remembered it when I found a similar "be courageous" hint in a German wiki, and now I found the related page in Wikipedia. So You didn't necessarily needed to revert that "tampering", it was just a special attempt of honoring Your idea as being established now in this wiki. I made the new page because some makers of this project already became too doubtful concerning changes, because they could be "damaging" to the whole project. But I learned from another wiki: No change, no life. We want a living project, so we can't discourage change. If we won't allow anonymous edits that would be good, but the ones who have decided to become project members shall not be discouraged by doubtful discussions, they should find a place to become creative with their ideas to enrich this camera knowledge base. Be bold, of course carefully, not loosing view for good compromises and consent, and let this wiki grow.
Best regards, U. Kulick 10:52, 29 April 2011 (PDT)
