Difference between revisions of "Trinar"
m |
m |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{Flickr_image | {{Flickr_image | ||
|image_source= http://www.flickr.com/photos/in2classics/12561947393/in/pool-camerawiki | |image_source= http://www.flickr.com/photos/in2classics/12561947393/in/pool-camerawiki | ||
| − | |image= http://farm8.staticflickr.com/7306/ | + | |image= http://farm8.staticflickr.com/7306/12561947393_7f9dc2e8ca_.jpg |
|image_align= left | |image_align= left | ||
| − | |image_text= The lens in a fast shutter on [[rangefinder camera]] means that it | + | |image_text= The lens in a fast shutter on [[rangefinder camera]] means that it was featured as lens with nnotable quality. |
|image_by= in2classics | |image_by= in2classics | ||
|image_rights= (C) | |image_rights= (C) | ||
}}{{br}} | }}{{br}} | ||
| − | The '''Trinar''' was a [[lens]] made by [[Rodenstock]]. It was made as well for [[camera]]s as for [[enlarger]]s. It was obviously offered for [[camera]]s as [[normal lens]], and despite of its three-element construction it was featured almost like a | + | The '''Trinar''' was a [[lens]] made by [[Rodenstock]]. It was made as well for [[camera]]s as for [[enlarger]]s. It was obviously offered for [[camera]]s as [[normal lens]], and despite of its three-element construction it was featured almost like a lens well-rendering upper-quality lens. Some say it was better than [[Schneider]]'s Radionar.<ref>[http://photo.net/medium-format-photography-forum/006i4Q better than Radionar?] photo.net discussion</ref> Others say it's sharp just in the frame center and maybe better for BW-photography, maybe comparable with [[Zeiss]]' Triotar.<ref>[http://www.apug.org/forums/forum41/46513-rodenstock-trinar.html maybe good enough for black&white] APUG.org discussion</ref> |
===enlarger lenses=== | ===enlarger lenses=== | ||
Revision as of 19:46, 16 February 2014
|
| The lens in a fast shutter on rangefinder camera means that it was featured as lens with nnotable quality. image by in2classics (Image rights) |
The Trinar was a lens made by Rodenstock. It was made as well for cameras as for enlargers. It was obviously offered for cameras as normal lens, and despite of its three-element construction it was featured almost like a lens well-rendering upper-quality lens. Some say it was better than Schneider's Radionar.[1] Others say it's sharp just in the frame center and maybe better for BW-photography, maybe comparable with Zeiss' Triotar.[2]
enlarger lenses
- Rodenstock Trinar 1:4,5 f=75mm
- Rodenstock Trinar 1:4,5 f=50mm
- Rodenstock Trinar 1:3,5 f=50mm
cameras with Trinar
| *Ohca | |
| *Idea A | |
| *First Roll | |
| *First Etui | |
| *Beirette | |
| *Romax plate folder | |
| *Edixa 16 | - Rodenstock Trinar 1:2,8 f=25mm |
| *Boots Pakmatic | - Rodenstock Trinar 1:2,8 f=38mm |
| *Bilora Bella | - Rodenstock-Trinar 1:2,8 f=45mm |
| *Regula L | - Rodenstock-Trinar 1:2,8 f=45mm |
| *Durata | - Rodenstock Trinar 1:3.5 f=4.5cm |
| *Baldina | - Rodenstock Trinar 1:2.8 f=50mm |
| *Metharette | - Rodenstock Trinar-Anastigmat 1:4.5 5cm |
| *Ysella | - Rodenstock Trinar 1:2.9 5cm |
| *Altiflex | - Rodenstock-Trinar-Anastigmat 1:4.5 f=75mm |
| *Ysette | - Rodenstock Trinar 1:2.9 7.5cm |
| *Lisette | - Rodenstock-Trinar 1:2.8 f=80mm |
| *Metharette | - Rodenstock Trinar-Anastigmat 1:4.5 5cm |
| *Rokuoh-Sha Special Pearlette | - Rodenstock Trinar-Anastigmat 1:4.5 4inch |
| *Franka Rolfix II/Hapo 5 | - Rodenstock-Trinar 1:3.5 f=105mm |
| *Supreme | - Rodenstock Trinar 1:4.5 f=10.5cm |
| *Kinka plate folders | - Rodenstock Trinar 1:4.5 f=10.5cm |
| *Kokka | - Rodenstock Trinar Anastigmat 1:6.3 f=10.5cm |
Conclusion: The lens was a worldwide success, over decades. Probaly a few copies were made by Japanese lens makers.
References
- ↑ better than Radionar? photo.net discussion
- ↑ maybe good enough for black&white APUG.org discussion
