Difference between revisions of "Talk:Y.K. Optical"
(In M mount?) |
Rebollo fr (talk | contribs) m (Talk:Kobalux moved to Talk:Y.K. Optical: moved to the maker's name) |
||
| (One intermediate revision by the same user not shown) | |||
| Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
I read that there were Kobalux lenses in M mount. Oh really? Which were they? -- [[User:Hoary|Hoary]] 09:32, 9 May 2006 (EDT) | I read that there were Kobalux lenses in M mount. Oh really? Which were they? -- [[User:Hoary|Hoary]] 09:32, 9 May 2006 (EDT) | ||
| + | |||
| + | : I vaguely remember a picture of a box marked "M mount" in an ebay auction. It is possible that it was only a L39 lens with an adapter, as the set shown [http://www.dantestella.com/technical/kobalux.html here at dantestella].<br> There is [http://www.photo.net/bboard/q-and-a-fetch-msg?msg_id=0075pP a post on photo.net] with someone reporting having bought a true M mount 28/3.5. This is the only first hand source. The rest is second or third hand rumour, like [http://www.beststuff.com/forum/read.php?21,35535,35540#msg-35540 this post at beststuff] or [http://leica-users.org/v19/msg01017.html this post at leica-users.com]. --[[User:Rebollo fr|Rebollo fr]] 13:25, 9 May 2006 (EDT) | ||
Latest revision as of 14:12, 5 May 2007
M mount?
I read that there were Kobalux lenses in M mount. Oh really? Which were they? -- Hoary 09:32, 9 May 2006 (EDT)
- I vaguely remember a picture of a box marked "M mount" in an ebay auction. It is possible that it was only a L39 lens with an adapter, as the set shown here at dantestella.
There is a post on photo.net with someone reporting having bought a true M mount 28/3.5. This is the only first hand source. The rest is second or third hand rumour, like this post at beststuff or this post at leica-users.com. --Rebollo fr 13:25, 9 May 2006 (EDT)
