Difference between revisions of "Talk:Sigma"
Rebollo fr (talk | contribs) (→Lenses: an answer) |
|||
| (One intermediate revision by one other user not shown) | |||
| Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
Is it ok to add the Lens list as i did below? | Is it ok to add the Lens list as i did below? | ||
I know that this is a Camerapedia and not a Lenspedia, but what is a camera without the lens? | I know that this is a Camerapedia and not a Lenspedia, but what is a camera without the lens? | ||
| + | -- [[User:Pho|Per Hoffmann Olsen]] 23:17, 1 September 2007 (Vienna, Austria) | ||
| + | |||
| + | :Hello and welcome here! | ||
| + | :Yes it is ok to add a list of lenses, there are even precedents such as the page about [[39mm screw lenses]]. It just seems to me that a list of available lenses will likely become outdated in a not too distant future, whereas a list of past and available Sigma lenses (even an incomplete one) would better match the rest of the site. | ||
| + | :Regards, | ||
| + | :--[[User:Rebollo fr|Rebollo fr]] 16:45, 3 September 2007 (EDT) | ||
Latest revision as of 20:45, 3 September 2007
Lenses
Is it ok to add the Lens list as i did below? I know that this is a Camerapedia and not a Lenspedia, but what is a camera without the lens? -- Per Hoffmann Olsen 23:17, 1 September 2007 (Vienna, Austria)
- Hello and welcome here!
- Yes it is ok to add a list of lenses, there are even precedents such as the page about 39mm screw lenses. It just seems to me that a list of available lenses will likely become outdated in a not too distant future, whereas a list of past and available Sigma lenses (even an incomplete one) would better match the rest of the site.
- Regards,
- --Rebollo fr 16:45, 3 September 2007 (EDT)
