Difference between revisions of "Talk:Pearl (6×9 self-erecting)"
Rebollo fr (talk | contribs) (The formats) |
Rebollo fr (talk | contribs) (Konishi, Rokuoh-sha, Konishiroku) |
||
Line 10: | Line 10: | ||
--[[User:Rebollo fr|Rebollo fr]] 14:00, 2 July 2006 (EDT) | --[[User:Rebollo fr|Rebollo fr]] 14:00, 2 July 2006 (EDT) | ||
+ | |||
+ | == Konishi, Rokuoh-sha, Konishiroku == | ||
+ | |||
+ | I notice that you're saying "by Konishi and Konishiroku". I don't have a clear idea of the relationship between the names Konishi, Konishiroku and Rokuoh-sha, does the source you mention explain this? | ||
+ | |||
+ | --[[User:Rebollo fr|Rebollo fr]] 14:02, 2 July 2006 (EDT) |
Revision as of 18:02, 2 July 2006
The formats
I changed the page title because the original Pearl takes larger than 6×9 exposures.
In McKeown I have the following models:
- Pearl II, III and IV (1909): 8×10.5 format on 118 film or plates
- Pearl (1911) for 8×13.7(?) format on 118 film or 8×10.5 plates
- Pearl No.2 (1923-1931) for 6×9 on 120 film, wooden then all metal
- Pearl (1933) for 6×9 on 120 film, metal
--Rebollo fr 14:00, 2 July 2006 (EDT)
Konishi, Rokuoh-sha, Konishiroku
I notice that you're saying "by Konishi and Konishiroku". I don't have a clear idea of the relationship between the names Konishi, Konishiroku and Rokuoh-sha, does the source you mention explain this?
--Rebollo fr 14:02, 2 July 2006 (EDT)