Difference between revisions of "Talk:Momikon"
Rebollo fr (talk | contribs) |
|||
| Line 4: | Line 4: | ||
(Sorry I am not so familiar to editing Camerapedia.) | (Sorry I am not so familiar to editing Camerapedia.) | ||
Thanks a lot. Pistik100d | Thanks a lot. Pistik100d | ||
| + | |||
| + | :I understand what you mean. But maybe the title would be a bit too long. What about "Momikon/Mometta series" or "Momikon and Mometta series" instead? There are precedents for this, for example [[Regula III series]], [[Minolta XG series]] or [[Mamiya/Sekor TL/DTL series]], circumventing the need for a full list of models. | ||
| + | :In any case, I would certainly be very interested to read more details about these cameras here. --[[User:Rebollo fr|rebollo_fr]] 12:57, 21 June 2010 (EDT) | ||
Revision as of 16:57, 21 June 2010
I think it would be good to merge this page with the Mometta page, to make a single page on Momikon and Mometta. Do you agree? --rebollo_fr 09:05, 17 June 2010 (EDT)
Yes I agree but I prefer "Momikon, Mometta, Mometta II, Mometta III and Mometta Junior". "Momikon and Mometta" sounds just like two cameras. In case of the long title with 5 camera names I would add some details for the other Mometta cameras as well. (Sorry I am not so familiar to editing Camerapedia.) Thanks a lot. Pistik100d
- I understand what you mean. But maybe the title would be a bit too long. What about "Momikon/Mometta series" or "Momikon and Mometta series" instead? There are precedents for this, for example Regula III series, Minolta XG series or Mamiya/Sekor TL/DTL series, circumventing the need for a full list of models.
- In any case, I would certainly be very interested to read more details about these cameras here. --rebollo_fr 12:57, 21 June 2010 (EDT)
