Difference between revisions of "Talk:Minolta Vest"
Rebollo fr (talk | contribs) (bibliography order) |
(→Bibliography: agreement) |
||
| Line 5: | Line 5: | ||
:I'm not sure what to do. For the bibliography items, I'm reluctant to break the alphabetical order and the language is often obvious from the title. The situation is different for internet links: a casual reader could be disappoited to follow links to Japanese pages while he was not warned. By the way, some Wikipedia projects use small templates looking like '''(en)''' or '''(fr)''' to tell the language of the external links. Do you think it would be a good idea to do the same? --[[User:Rebollo fr|Rebollo fr]] 12:32, 29 December 2006 (EST) | :I'm not sure what to do. For the bibliography items, I'm reluctant to break the alphabetical order and the language is often obvious from the title. The situation is different for internet links: a casual reader could be disappoited to follow links to Japanese pages while he was not warned. By the way, some Wikipedia projects use small templates looking like '''(en)''' or '''(fr)''' to tell the language of the external links. Do you think it would be a good idea to do the same? --[[User:Rebollo fr|Rebollo fr]] 12:32, 29 December 2006 (EST) | ||
| + | |||
| + | My initial reaction is to agree on both counts, but let me think (vacillate) about it. -- [[User:Hoary|Hoary]] 20:44, 29 December 2006 (EST) | ||
Latest revision as of 01:44, 30 December 2006
Bibliography
"Are we no longer sorting into "English", "French", etc.?"
SGML comment left by Hoary on 29 Dec 2006.
- I'm not sure what to do. For the bibliography items, I'm reluctant to break the alphabetical order and the language is often obvious from the title. The situation is different for internet links: a casual reader could be disappoited to follow links to Japanese pages while he was not warned. By the way, some Wikipedia projects use small templates looking like (en) or (fr) to tell the language of the external links. Do you think it would be a good idea to do the same? --Rebollo fr 12:32, 29 December 2006 (EST)
My initial reaction is to agree on both counts, but let me think (vacillate) about it. -- Hoary 20:44, 29 December 2006 (EST)
