Difference between revisions of "Talk:Medium format"
(cut film?) |
Rebollo fr (talk | contribs) (→Cut film: why not) |
||
| (One intermediate revision by one other user not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
==Cut film== | ==Cut film== | ||
| − | What about cut film? | + | What about cut film? Should this article have a roll film and a cut film section? |
| + | |||
| + | ''Posted by [[User:Agricola|Agricola]] on Sep 20, 2006'' | ||
| + | |||
| + | :Yes for the 4.5×6 and 6.5×9 sizes, now nearly obsolete. The larger sizes would go in the [[Large format]] page. Anyway part of this page is quite duplicate with the [[120 film]] page, and this would need a cleanup. --[[User:Rebollo fr|Rebollo fr]] 11:09, 20 September 2006 (EDT) | ||
Latest revision as of 15:09, 20 September 2006
Cut film
What about cut film? Should this article have a roll film and a cut film section?
Posted by Agricola on Sep 20, 2006
- Yes for the 4.5×6 and 6.5×9 sizes, now nearly obsolete. The larger sizes would go in the Large format page. Anyway part of this page is quite duplicate with the 120 film page, and this would need a cleanup. --Rebollo fr 11:09, 20 September 2006 (EDT)
