Difference between revisions of "Talk:Main Page/Old"
m (Reverted edit of Mama60, changed back to last version by Lbstone) |
|||
Line 7: | Line 7: | ||
: An "unknown" category makes sense to me. --[[User:Lbstone|Lbstone]] 04:11, 23 Jan 2005 (EST) | : An "unknown" category makes sense to me. --[[User:Lbstone|Lbstone]] 04:11, 23 Jan 2005 (EST) | ||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
== Film == | == Film == | ||
Line 26: | Line 12: | ||
Shouldn't there be a category for various film types? (i.e., B&W, C-41, infrared, silver types, etc.) | Shouldn't there be a category for various film types? (i.e., B&W, C-41, infrared, silver types, etc.) | ||
: I say go for it. --[[User:Lbstone|Lbstone]] 19:30, 21 Jun 2005 (EDT) | : I say go for it. --[[User:Lbstone|Lbstone]] 19:30, 21 Jun 2005 (EDT) | ||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
== Camera makers == | == Camera makers == | ||
Line 50: | Line 22: | ||
: My concern is that so many makers are both digital and analog, so it may be a little confusing. In any event, I don't believe the list is too overwhelming at this point. Maybe later on down the road we may have a greater need to group them, but right now I don't see it as a big deal. --[[User:Lbstone|Lbstone]] 13:35, 19 October 2005 (EDT) | : My concern is that so many makers are both digital and analog, so it may be a little confusing. In any event, I don't believe the list is too overwhelming at this point. Maybe later on down the road we may have a greater need to group them, but right now I don't see it as a big deal. --[[User:Lbstone|Lbstone]] 13:35, 19 October 2005 (EDT) | ||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− |
Revision as of 04:58, 4 November 2005
"Unknown" Category
Should there be a "Misc" catch-all category or perhaps an "Unknown" category?
For example, where would (or could) I place the Time-Life Magazine Toy Camera I own? I don't think Time-Life needs it's own manufacturer category because it was simply a re-branding but I'm still not sure who actually made this camera. --phule 15:13, 21 Jan 2005 (EST)
- An "unknown" category makes sense to me. --Lbstone 04:11, 23 Jan 2005 (EST)
Film
Shouldn't there be a category for various film types? (i.e., B&W, C-41, infrared, silver types, etc.)
- I say go for it. --Lbstone 19:30, 21 Jun 2005 (EDT)
Camera makers
Before people add each and every maker existing or having existed in the past so many years, and there is a bunch, maybe we should make subcategories:
- Digital only makers, ie all the brands that are mainly electronic brands and make digital cameras, (ex. Apple, Sony, Panasonic, Toshiba)
- Today's analogical makers (ex. Konica-Minolta, Nikon, Canon), or ex-analogical which went all-digital for their cameras (ex. Kodak)
- Analogical camera makers no longer in activity
--rebollo_fr 23 Sep 2005
- My concern is that so many makers are both digital and analog, so it may be a little confusing. In any event, I don't believe the list is too overwhelming at this point. Maybe later on down the road we may have a greater need to group them, but right now I don't see it as a big deal. --Lbstone 13:35, 19 October 2005 (EDT)