Difference between revisions of "Talk:Kodak P850"
| (One intermediate revision by the same user not shown) | |||
| Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
: You are correct. The people over at the Wikipedia project set a good precedent for Neutral Point-of-View ([http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/WP:NPOV NPOV]). I strongly believe that we should follow their lead in this area. Feel free to remove/update any content that doesn't follow this policy. --[[User:Lbstone|Lbstone]] 11:36, 12 December 2005 (EST) | : You are correct. The people over at the Wikipedia project set a good precedent for Neutral Point-of-View ([http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/WP:NPOV NPOV]). I strongly believe that we should follow their lead in this area. Feel free to remove/update any content that doesn't follow this policy. --[[User:Lbstone|Lbstone]] 11:36, 12 December 2005 (EST) | ||
| + | |||
| + | Ok have changed that part now, and I do agree, wasnt quite sure, wanted to make it sound a little more "human" at the same time and not only "cold" facts. I realise this is not a review site as such. --Skyrider 16 December 2005 | ||
Latest revision as of 21:38, 15 December 2005
Unless I'm mistaken, entries on this website should be as opinion-free as possible. Comments such as This is what Kodak says on their website and I do agree with this, it takes great photos with very crisp colours and the 12x optical zoom is indeed very good. should be left for the discussion area. --phule 11:28, 12 December 2005 (EST)
- You are correct. The people over at the Wikipedia project set a good precedent for Neutral Point-of-View (NPOV). I strongly believe that we should follow their lead in this area. Feel free to remove/update any content that doesn't follow this policy. --Lbstone 11:36, 12 December 2005 (EST)
Ok have changed that part now, and I do agree, wasnt quite sure, wanted to make it sound a little more "human" at the same time and not only "cold" facts. I realise this is not a review site as such. --Skyrider 16 December 2005
